SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Cal) 619

JOYMALYA BAGCHI
Pulin Behari Pahari – Appellant
Versus
Gour Sundar Jana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Rita Patra
For the Opposite Party : Anand Keshri

JUDGMENT :

Joymalya Bagchi, J.

Both the revision petitions are taken up together for hearing and disposed of by a common order.

2. Two cheques, one bearing No.22277 dated 15.10.2007 for Rs. 30,000/- and another bearing No.22278 dated 26.10.2007 for Rs. 18,43,323/-, both drawn on Development Credit Bank Ltd., Gariahat Branch were allegedly issued by the petitioner in favour of the opposite party. The cheques on presentation were returned dishonoured to the opposite party on 22.12.2007. Cheque for Rs. 30,000/- was returned with the remark "payment stopped by the drawer" and the cheque for Rs. 18,43,323/- was returned with the remark "funds insufficient". Demand notices were issued by the petitioner through registered speed post with acknowledgement due card which was returned to the opposite party on 24.1.2008. Another set of demand notices were issued at another address of the petitioner which were served and such intimation was communicated to the opposite party by the Superintendent of Post Office, Contai. The petitioner failed and neglected to make payment and hence two prosecutions being C.R. Case No.47 of 2008 and C.R. No.48 of 2008 were instituted in respect of the aforesaid cheq


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top