IN THE HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Biswanath Somadder, J.
Bimal Kumar Das - Petitioner
Versus
The State of West Bengal & Ors. - Respondents
WP 11282 (W) of 2016
Decided On : 05-07-2016
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 - ROUTE - SECTION 2(38) - STAGE CARRIAGE PERMIT - SECTION 72 - TIMETABLE - RULES 118 AND 133 OF WEST BENGAL MOTOR VEHICLES RULES, 1989 - REJECTION OF TIMETABLE - INTERPRETATION.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, having been granted a stage carriage permit to ply his vehicle on the route 'Solepatta to Garia', sought to revise the timetable to ply the vehicle from 'Garia to Solepatta' instead, claiming it to be more commercially viable. The Secretary, State Transport Authority, rejected the request based on the statutory definition of 'route' and the conditions imposed on stage carriage permits.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the statutory definition of 'route' under Section 2(38) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, refers to a line of travel between one terminus and another, and does not contemplate a reversal of the route. The petitioner had consciously chosen the route from 'Solepatta to Garia' and had accepted the provisional timetable without protest. Therefore, the Secretary, State Transport Authority, was correct in rejecting the request for a revised timetable.
Issues: 1. Whether the rejection of the timetable proposed by the petitioner for plying his vehicle on the route 'Solepatta to Garia' was in accordance with the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and the West Bengal Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989. 2. Whether the statutory definition of 'route' under Section 2(38) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, allows for a reversal of the route.
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The statutory definition of 'route' under Section 2(38) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, refers to a line of travel between one terminus and another, and does not contemplate a reversal of the route. 2. The petitioner had consciously chosen the route from 'Solepatta to Garia' and had accepted the provisional timetable without protest. Therefore, the Secretary, State Transport Authority, was correct in rejecting the request for a revised timetable.
Final Decision: The writ petition filed by the petitioner was dismissed.
Affidavit of service filed in Court today be taken on record.
2. Having heard the learned advocates for the parties and upon perusing the instant application, it appears that the only issue which falls for consideration in the facts and circumstances of the instant case is whether the rejection of the timetable proposed by the petitioner for plying of his vehicle bearing No. WB-31-7581 on the route 'Solepatta to Garia' is in accordance with the provisions of section 2 sub-section (38) and section 72 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, read with Rules 118 and 133 of the West Bengal Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989, or not.
3. It appears from the facts of the instant case that the petitioner was granted permit to ply his vehicle on the following route:
"Route – Solepatta to Garia Station via Egra, Contai, Henria, Nandakumar, NH 41, Mechada, NH 6, Santragachi, Howrah CDBT, Vidyasagar Setu, Rabindra Sadan, Tollygunj, N.S.C. Bose Road."
4. Such permit was issued on 4th February, 2016 and is valid till 3rd February, 2021. A provisionally approved timetable was also issued, which was accepted by the petitioner by signing on the same without any demur or protest. Subsequently, by a letter dated 22nd March, 2016, the petitioner made a prayer before the Secretary, State Transport Authority, to revise the said timetable so that he could ply the vehicle ".... from Garia instead of Solepatta economically by taking care of day to day management of the said vehicle ....". The reason for making such an application has been stated in details in the petitioner's letter dated 22nd March, 2016.
5. The main reasons provided by the Secretary, State Transport Authority, West Bengal, in his/her letter dated 3rd June, 2016, while rejecting the prayer of the petitioner for revising the timetable are as follows:
"i) He applied for permit, in the prescribed format, for the route 'Solepatta to Garia'. His application was approved by the STA. The permit along with the time table was issued in accordance with the approved alignment.
(ii) The route 'Solepatta to Garia' indicates that 'Solepatta' is the originating point in uptrip and 'Garia' being the terminating point. The notion of uptrip and down trip is irreversibly interlinked with the particular description of route alignment.
(iii) His proposed time table in uptrip is from 'Garia Station to Solepatta' i.e. just reverse to the approved trip alignment. Hence, based on the reasoning at para (ii) above, his prayer is regretted."
6. The clear statutory provisions relating to the definition of a "route" and the conditions and limitations imposed upon those who ply stage carriage in an approved "route", are discussed herein below.
Section 2 sub-section (38) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 reads as follows:
"(38) "route" means a line of travel which specifies the highway which may be traversed by a motor vehicle between one terminus and another;"
7. A plain reading of the statutory definition of the term "route" means a line of travel traversed by a motor vehicle between one terminus and another. In other words, a motor vehicle may traverse between terminus X and terminus Y. Thus, the line of travel between X and Y would define a "route".
8. Section 72 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 provides for grant of stage carriage permit. Sub-section (2) of section 72 provides for attachment of any one or more of the conditions stipulated thereunder by the Regional Transport Authority, if it decides to grant a stage carriage permit of a specified description, subject to any rules made under the Motor Vehicles Act. The conditions stipulated in the sub-clauses under sub-section (2) of section 72 include the following:
"(i) that the vehicles shall be used only in a specified area, or on a specified route or routes;
(iii) the minimum and maximum number of daily trips to be provided in relation to any route or area generally or on specified days and occasions;
(iv) that copies of the time-table of the stage carriage approved by the Regional T
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.