SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Cal) 943

JYOTIRMAY BHATTACHARYA, ISHAN CHANDRA DAS
Bijoy Lakshmi Saharoy – Appellant
Versus
Maniklal Dutta – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Biswarup Biswas
For the Respondent: Mr. Partha Pratim Roy

JUDGMENT :

Jyotirmay Bhattacharya, J.

1. While this stay application filed in connection with the First Miscellaneous Appeal was taken up for hearing, we were requested by the learned counsel appearing for the parties to dispose of the appeal itself on merit. We are informed by the learned counsel appearing for the parties that all papers necessary for disposal of the appeal are available on record and as such, we have decided to dispose of the appeal itself on merit on the basis of the materials available before us by dispensing with the requirement of filing paper books in this appeal.

2. Let us now consider the merit of the instant first miscellaneous appeal in the facts of the present case.

3. The appellants herein who was the defendants in a suit for eviction filed an appeal being Title Appeal No. 79 of 2008 before the learned First Appellate Court for challenging the eviction decree passed against them by the learned Trial Court. The appeal matured for hearing. Despite adjournments were granted to the appellants on two or three occasions, the appellants were not ready in participating in the hearing of the appeal on 5th March, 2014 which was peremptorily fixed for hearing of the













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top