HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.
In the matter of: Abani Ghosh @ Abani Bhusan Ghosh @ Biswas - Petitioner
W.P. 8151 (W) of 2015
Decided On : 22-12-2015
FOREIGNERS ACT - REGISTRATION AS CITIZEN - FOREIGNERS (AMENDMENT) ORDER, 2015 - PASSPORT (ENTRY INTO INDIA) AMENDMENT RULES, 2015 - The court held that the petitioner, who entered India without valid documents due to religious persecution before December 31, 2014, is exempted from the provisions of the Foreigners Act and is entitled to apply for registration as a citizen of India.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a Bangladeshi national, entered India in 1970 due to religious persecution and has been residing in India since then. He married an Indian citizen and has two children. He applied for registration as a citizen of India but his application was not processed. He was arrested and convicted under the Foreigners Act for entering India without valid documents. He filed a writ petition challenging his conviction and seeking registration as a citizen of India.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner was entitled to exemption from the provisions of the Foreigners Act as per the Foreigners (Amendment) Order, 2015 and the Passport (Entry into India) Amendment Rules, 2015. The court also found that the petitioner had been residing in India for a long period of time and had family and property in India.
Issues: 1. Whether the petitioner is entitled to exemption from the provisions of the Foreigners Act? 2. Whether the petitioner is entitled to apply for registration as a citizen of India?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that the petitioner was entitled to exemption from the provisions of the Foreigners Act as per the Foreigners (Amendment) Order, 2015 and the Passport (Entry into India) Amendment Rules, 2015, which exempt persons who entered India without valid documents due to religious persecution before December 31, 2014. 2. The court also held that the petitioner was entitled to apply for registration as a citizen of India as he had been residing in India for a long period of time and had family and property in India.
Final Decision: The court directed the petitioner to submit the prescribed forms and relevant documents for registration as a citizen of India to the respondent within 6 weeks. The respondent was directed to forward the application to the Central Government within 8 weeks. The Central Government was directed to take a final decision on the petitioner's application within 8 weeks of receiving the application and report from the respondent. The court also directed that the execution of the order of repatriation/deportation passed against the petitioner shall remain suspended till his application for registration as a citizen of India is disposed of.
The instant writ application has been preferred, inter alia, praying for consideration of the petitioner’s claim towards grant of registration as a citizen of India and for a direction to release the petitioner from custody in the Midnapore Correctional Home.
2. Shorn of unnecessary details, the facts are that the petitioner along with his family members left East Pakistan before the “Mukti Juddha” in the year 1970 and took shelter in India, when he was only 12 years of age. Since then the petitioner is residing in the district of Midnapore along with his family members. On 4th October, 1991 the petitioner got married and such marriage was duly registered. Out of the said wedlock two sons were born who are presently aged about 13 years and 21 years. On 30th June, 1998 the petitioner was gifted a plot of land upon which he constructed a thatched house. The said deed of gift was also registered before the competent authority. On proper application the petitioner has been issued Ration Card, Aadhaar Card and Voters Identity Card. The petitioner also made an application towards grant of registration as a citizen of India. As the said representation was kept pending, the petitioner was constrained to approach this Court earlier by a writ application, being W. P. No. 19496 (W) of 2003 and the same was disposed of by this Court on 1st April, 2004 directing the respondent no.3 to consider the petitioner’s application and to pass a reasoned order. The petitioner’s repeated representations thereafter were not attended to by the respondents and almost five years thereafter, the petitioner was asked to attend a hearing in the office of the respondent no.3 on 11th September, 2009. Thereafter the petitioner was served a copy of a memorandum dated 10th January, 2012 by which the Joint Secretary to the Government of West Bengal, Home Department sought for some instruction from the Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs. Till date the petitioner’s application has not been disposed of by the competent authority. In the midst thereof, an enquiry was conducted by the police authorities and alleging that the petitioner is a citizen of Bangladesh and has entered into this country without valid documents, a First Information Report was lodged and on the basis of the same a prosecution under Section 14 of the Foreigners Act was launched against the petitioner being G.R. Case No.08 of 1983 and a final order was passed in the same on 26th June, 1992 sentencing him to suffer a simple imprisonment for a period of three months and to pay fine of Rs.200/- and it was also directed that after expiry of the period of sentence, the petitioner be repatriated to Bangladesh under proper escort. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner approached the statutory appellate forum but the said appeal was rejected and against such order of rejection the petitioner preferred a criminal revisional application before this Court being Criminal Revision No. 1319 of 1992. By an order dated 30th March, 1997 this Court was pleased to set aside the sentence and imprisonment, barring the sentence undergone by him. The petitioner, thereafter, renewed his prayer for registration as a citizen of India by issuing a letter dated 3rd of January, 2004. On 26th of February, 2015, the petitioner was again taken into custody in connection with G.R. Case No.8 of 1983 and ultimately by an order dated 26th February, 2016 bail was refused. The Court observed that necessary arrangement may be taken for repatriating him to Bangladesh as there was no specific order as to the stay of pushback.
3. In course of hearing, Mr. Sanyal, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the provisions of the Foreigners Act, Passport Act (Entry into India), 1920 have been amended and in view of such submissions, Mr. Singh, learned advocate appearing for the Union of India was requested to produce the relevant circulars. In response thereto, Mr. Singh has plac
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.