SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Cal) 523

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Ashoke Kumar Dasadhikari, J.
Smt. Kalyani Bhattacharyya & Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
State of West Bengal & Ors. - Respondents
W.P. No. 34253 (W) of 2014
Decided On : 09-03-2015

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant: Ekramul Bari, S.S. Mondal
For the Respondents: Kamalesh Bhattacharya, Bidhan Biswas, Subir Sanyal, Sumita Sanyal

The provisions of the West Bengal Primary Education Act, 1973 and the Rules framed thereunder do not apply to the exceptional cases of successors of assistant teachers who die in harness during the service period as assistant teacher in higher secondary school having qualifications for appointment as primary school teacher.

Headnote:

PRIMARY EDUCATION - COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT - JURISDICTION - WEST BENGAL PRIMARY EDUCATION ACT, 1973 - RULES FRAMED THEREUNDER - GOVERNMENT ORDERS - INTERPRETATION - APPLICABILITY:

Fact of the Case:

Father of the petitioners, an assistant teacher in a secondary school, died in harness. Widow's application for appointment on compassionate ground was not considered. Son applied for appointment on compassionate ground in "die-in-harness" category. His name was recorded in the life register maintained by the office of District Inspector of School, Secondary Education, Birbhum. District Inspector of School, Secondary Education, Birbhum forwarded his name to the concerned District Primary School Council for consideration of his prayer for appointment as a primary teacher. His prayer was kept pending for a long time. He filed a writ petition which was disposed of with a direction to the concerned respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner and dispose of the same in accordance with law upon hearing the petitioner and passing a reasoned order within 12 weeks from the date of communication of the order passed by the Hon'ble court. Pursuant to such direction, petitioner was called upon by the Chairman, Birbhum District Primary School Council to submit some documents and papers. In spite of receipt of all those documents in August 2012, no decision was taken on the application of the petitioner for his appointment on compassionate ground. Proposal for appointment was also not sent by the Chairman of the District Primary School Council to the Director of School Education, West Bengal, now designated as Commissioner of School Education, West Bengal for approval. Thereafter second writ application was filed by the petitioner with a prayer for issuance of writ of mandamus directing the Chairman, Birbhum District Primary School Council to forward the proposal for compassionate appointment before Director of School Education, now designated as Commissioner of School Education with a further direction upon the Director of School Education to approve the same on receipt of such proposal from the Chairman. The second writ application filed by the petitioner was also dismissed by the learned single judge. The widow as well as the petitioner preferred an appeal which was allowed by the Hon'ble Division Bench with a direction to the Chairman of the Birbhum District Primary Schools Council to take his ultimate decision on the fate of the said application of the appellant/petitioner No.2 and if ultimately a decision is taken by the said Chairman of the Council in favour of the appellant/petitioner No.2, he should forward the proposal for his appointment to the Director of School Education now designated as Commissioner of Schools Education, West Bengal so that the said authority can take the ultimate decision for approving the appointment of the appellant/petitioner No.2 immediately thereafter. In view of the aforementioned order directing the Chairman of the concerned Council to decide the case of the petitioner. It was made clear that in the event Chairman of the concerned District Primary School Council ultimately held that he has no jurisdiction to take ultimate decision, he will forward all necessary papers to the concerned authority who has jurisdiction to deal with. In terms of the order of the Hon'ble Division Bench dated 6th March 2014 the matter was taken up by the Chairman, Birbhum District Primary School Council and the petitioner's case was not considered taking note of Rule 14 of the Rules framed under the West Bengal Primary Education Act 1973.

Finding of the Court:

The Chairman of the Council has jurisdiction in view of the Government policy which was declared by the Government by two successive Orders. One is of dated 12th October 1987 bearing Memo No 457 Edn (P) and another is of dated 22nd August 2005 bearing memo no. 898 SE (Pry). The Government policy as regards the successor of assistant teachers who die in harness during the service period as assistant teacher in higher secondary school having qualifications for appointment as primary school teacher was dealt with by the two notifications. Therefore, the present Act of 1973 and Rules of 1991 do not apply in such type of exceptional cases. Accordingly, those rules have no manner of application in the instant case, which is an exceptional one.

Issues: Whether the Chairman of the District Primary School Council has jurisdiction to consider the petitioner's case for appointment on compassionate ground in view of the Government Orders dated 12th October 1987 and 22nd August 2005?

Ratio Decidendi: The Government policy as regards the successor of assistant teachers who die in harness during the service period as assistant teacher in higher secondary school having qualifications for appointment as primary school teacher was dealt with by the two notifications. Therefore, the present Act of 1973 and Rules of 1991 do not apply in such type of exceptional cases. Accordingly, those rules have no manner of application in the instant case, which is an exceptional one. The Chairman of the Council has jurisdiction in view of the Government policy which was declared by the Government by two successive Orders.

Final Decision: The impugned order is set aside. The Chairman of School Council is directed to recommend the case of the petitioner before the Commissioner of School Education for approval within four weeks from the date of communication of this order and the concerned Commissioner will give approval within two weeks thereafter.

JUDGMENT :

Ashoke Kumar Dasadhikari, J.

The father of the writ petitioners who was an assistant teacher in a secondary school died in harness on 30th November 1998. On his death, his widow applied for appointment on compassionate ground. Although her name was recorded in the life register, ultimately no decision was taken on her prayer for appointment on compassionate ground. Then the son of the deceased teacher applied for appointment on compassionate ground in Die'in'harness category. His name was recorded in the life register again maintained by the office of District Inspector of School, Secondary Education, Birbhum. Be it recorded that the petitioner being the son of the deceased teacher did not have requisite qualification for being appointed as an assistant teacher in the secondary school. His name was forwarded by the District Inspector of School, Secondary Education, Birbhum to the concerned District Primary School Council for consideration of his prayer for appointment as a primary teacher.

2. Petitioner's prayer for appointment as a primary teacher was kept pending for a long time. Petitioner moved writ petition being WP 30091(W) of 2008 which was disposed of by this court on 31st March 2009 directing the concerned respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner and dispose of the same in accordance with law upon hearing the petitioner and passing a reasoned order within 12 weeks from the date of communication of the order passed by the Hon'ble court.

3. Pursuant to such direction writ petitioner was called upon by the Chairman, Birbhum District Primary School Council to submit some documents and papers. In view of such direction, petitioner submitted all papers before the Chairman, Birbhum District Primary School Council as well as the DI of School, Mollarpur East Circle, Birbhum. In spite of receipt of all those documents in August 2012, no decision was taken on the application of the petitioner for his appointment on compassionate ground. Proposal for appointment was also not sent by the Chairman of the District Primary School Council to the Director of School Education, West Bengal, now designated as Commissioner of School Education, West Bengal for approval. Thereafter second writ application was filed by the petitioner with a prayer for issuance of writ of mandamus directing the Chairman, Birbhum District Primary School Council to forward the proposal for compassionate appointment before Director of School Education, now designated as Commissioner of School Education with a further direction upon the Director of School Education to approve the same on receipt of such proposal from the Chairman. The second writ application filed by the petitioner was also dismissed by the learned single judge.

4. The widow as well as the petitioner preferred an appeal being MAT 1747 of 2013. The appeal was heard before the Hon'ble Division Bench and the appeal was disposed of with the following direction :

"Having regard to the stage up to which the application of the appellant/petitioner No.2 has already proceeded with before the concerned District Primary School Council, we dispose of this appeal by directing the Chairman of the Birbhum District Primary Schools Council to take his ultimate decision on the fate of the said application of the appellant/petitioner No.2 and if ultimately a decision is taken by the said Chairman of the Council in favour of the appellant/petitioner No.2, he should forward the proposal for his appointment to the Director of School Education now designated as Commissioner of Schools Education, West Bengal so that the said authority can take the ultimate decision for approving the appointment of the appellant/petitioner No.2 immediately thereafter.

It is made clear that while disposing of the appeal, we have not considered the jurisdictional issue regarding jurisdiction of the Chairman of the said Council to entertain the prayer of the appellant/petitioner No.2 for his appointment on compassiona































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top