IN THE HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Jyotirmay Bhattacharya, Ishan Chandra Das, JJ.
Multiple Resorts Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Vs.
Mars Bullion Trade Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
F.M.A.T. 604 of 2016 and CAN 9683 of 2016
Decided On : 24-02-2017
Order 39 Rule 10 - Lease Agreement Dispute - Code of Civil Procedure - [Order 39 Rule 10]
Fact of the Case:
The plaintiff claimed ownership of a commercial space leased to the defendant. The plaintiff sought recovery of arrear rent, interest, and mesne profit, while the defendant contested the claims.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the defendant did not admit liability to pay compensation for common amenities and that the court could not adjudicate on disputed liabilities under Order 39 Rule 10. The impugned order was set aside, and the trial judge was directed to expedite the suit's disposal.
Issues: Dispute over liability for compensation for common amenities, interpretation of lease agreement clauses, and the court's jurisdiction under Order 39 Rule 10.
Ratio Decidendi: The court cannot adjudicate on disputed liabilities under Order 39 Rule 10, and the defendant's admission of liability is necessary to grant relief under the rule.
Final Decision: The impugned order was set aside, and the trial judge was directed to expedite the suit's disposal.
Jyotirmay Bhattacharya, J.
1. This First Miscellaneous Appeal is directed against an order being No. 14 dated 26th April, 2016 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, 1st Court at Barasat, in Title Suit No. 10843 of 2014 at the instance of the defendant/appellant.
2. By the impugned order, the plaintiff's application under Order 39 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure was allowed on contest with costs. The defendant/appellant was directed to clear all arrear occupational charges within three months from the date of communication of the impugned order in terms of the observation made in the body of the order and continue to pay the current occupational charges within seven days of every succeeding month. The defendant/appellant was further directed to show payment receipt on the next day as regards payment of maintenance charges in terms of Clause 23 of the term-sheet in favour of the Bengal Peerless so that the Court can ascertain as to whether it has paid those charges to Bengal Peerless or not.
3. The legality of the said order of the learned Trial Judge is under challenge in this First Miscellaneous Appeal.
4. Let us now consider the legality of the impugned order in the facts of the instant case.
5. The plaintiff claims that it has become the sole and absolute owner of a commercial space, covering approximately 17072 sq.ft., built up area, in Axis Mall, more fully described in the schedule of the plaint. The construction of the said property was admittedly done by the Bengal Peerless Housing Development Complex Limited. On 5th February, 2008 Bengal Peerless entered into an agreement with the defendant for leasing out the suit property to the defendant for a term of three years with the option of renewal for two further terms of three years. The said agreement is hereinafter referred to as the said term sheet.
6. In Clause 11 of the term-sheet, the lease rent was fixed at Rs. 10/- per sq.ft, per month. In Clause 12 of the term-sheet, compensation for common amenities was fixed at Rs. 40/- per sq.ft, per month. Clause 15 of the term-sheet further stipulates that there would be a rent-free period which would continue for a period of 90 days from the date of possession.
7. Clause 23 deals with the maintenance and management of the common areas which runs as follows:
"Intending lessee along with other occupiers/owners will form Common Area Management Committee (CAMC) to deal with the entire Maintenance and Management of the Common Area/Services/Facilities/Amenities.
The Maintenance and Management of Common Areas includes the property as a whole with all fittings and fixtures, House-keeping and Solid Waste Disposal, all Services/Amenities/Facilities such as Lifts, Escalator, A.C. Plant and Ventilation, Sub-station, DG Set Back-up Power, U.G. Reservoir, Fire Fighting Arrangement, Sanitary and Plumbing System, Sewage Disposal System, Area Lighting, Staircase Lighting, Water Supply System, Landscaping Security Guards and Persons engaged on Maintenance and Operation works etc. of the Complex.
Intending Lessee will pay to CAMC all maintenance and running expenses on pro-rata basis of Built-up area.
In case there be any delay on the part of Occupiers/Owners of the Complex to form CAMC and to engage the Agency for maintenance and management of Common Areas/Services, Lessor shall render such services for a maximum period of one year. In that event of delay an Advance is to be paid by all Occupiers/Owners including intending Lessee to Lessor to meet the cost of such maintenance and running expenses @ Rs. 15/- per month per sq.ft., for a period of 12 months before taking over possession for fit-out works. As soon as the Occupiers/Owners from the CAMC and take over the maintenance and management of the Common Areas/Services, the Advance for remaining period of 12 months shall be refunded to CAMC."
8. Though Rs. 40 per sq.ft. Per month was payable as compensation for common amenities, in terms of Clause 12 of the said term-sheet
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.