Rakesh Tiwari, J.

1. The appellants being dissatisfied with the order and judgment dated 12th July, 2016 passed by a Writ Court (Single Judge) in Writ Petition no. 1020(W) of 2016 (Ms. Suchandra Roy Another vs. Secretary, Education Department and Another) have preferred this appeal on the grounds that the learned Judge has erred in law in considering the general observations made by the outside examiner appointed vide order of this Court dated 7th June, 2016 wherein the examiner is said to have travelled beyond jurisdiction and that by the order dated 7th June, 2016, the Court was pleased to direct the Board of Studies of the college to appoint examiners from outside its faculties for the purpose of re-examination of module 7.1 of the appellant no. 1 and copy of the report of the external examiners was also not provided to the appellants and hence the general observations in the report which is stigmatic in nature, according to the petitioners, were liable to be quashed. The said report itself which has prejudicially affected the fate of the petitioners would itself ma