SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Cal) 314

ANIRUDDHA BOSE
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Build Fab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: O.P. Dubey, J.S. Dhatt.
For the Respondents: Bijon Majumdar, Prasanta Banerjee.

JUDGMENT :

1. The petitioner had engaged the respondent (claimant) for constructing a building for Regional Provident Commissioner at Kolkata. The agreement to that effect was executed on 21st August, 1994. It was initially agreed upon by and between the parties the starting date for execution of the work was to be 27th August, 1994, and the work was to be completed in twenty four months. The projected date of completion of the work, thus, was 26th August, 1996. The value of the contract was Rs. 90,34,898/- (Rupees ninety lacs thirty four thousand eight hundred and ninety eight only). The date of completion of work was extended by approximately twenty eight and the actual date of completion of work was 21st December, 1998. Clause 25 of the contract provided for resolution of disputes arising out of the contract by arbitration. In this clause, the Chief Engineer, Central Public Works Department in charge of the work at the material point of time was specified to be the arbitrator and the administrative head of the same organization was specified to be the arbitrator if there was no chief engineer.

2. Dispute had arisen in relation to certain claims made by the contractor after payment






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top