1. The subject matter of challenge in this writ petition is an order dated 30 April, 2012 whereby the respondent no. 2 being Sri Aurobinda Institute of Education, Salt Lake, Kolkata (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Institute’) terminated the service of the petitioner with effect from 2 June, 2012.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the Institute by a letter dated 18 November, 2010 appointed the petitioner as a Casual Ayah on contractual basis for a period of six months with effect from 9 November, 2010 subject to extension of another six months on the basis of her performance. By a letter dated 30 June, 2011, the Institute extended the service of the petitioner by six months with effect from 9 May, 2011. By a letter dated 13 January, 2012 the Institute offered further employment to the petitioner on inter alia the term that she would be on probation for a period of one year from 1 January, 2012 to 31 December, 2012. By an order dated 30 April, 2012 the Institute terminated the service of the petitioner with effect from 2 June, 2012.

3. The petitioner made representations dated 14 May, 2012, 12 September, 2012 and 30 January, 2013(through her Advocate) to the Institute