SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Cal) 436

DEBI PROSAD DEY
Mayank Poddar – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants :Milan Mukherjee, Sr. Advocate, Sandipan Ganguly, Advocate
For the Opposite Parties :Tirthankar Ghosh, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

1. The application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed for quashing the proceedings of case no. C-480 of 2008 under Section 406/34 of the Indian Penal Code pending before learned Judicial Magistrate, First Court, Sealdah, South 24 Parganas.

2. Despite service of notice opposite party no. 1 and 2 did not turn up to contest this application. Opposite party no. 2/Madhusudan Das (herein after referred to as opposite party only) had filed an application before learned Magistrate at Sealdah for referring the same to the concerned police station under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The application was taken up by learned Magistrate and after considering the materials, cognizance was taken by learned Magistrate. After examination of the complainant and his witness, summons were issued against all the accused. All the accused named in the petition of complaint duly appeared before learned Magistrate and contested the case. In the meantime, the present petitioners being accused no. 2, 3 and 4 have filed this application for qua
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top