SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Cal) 519

SAHIDULLAH MUNSHI
Chitrita Dey – Appellant
Versus
Satyanarayan Tripathi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Plaintiff : Mr. Jishnu Chowdhury, Mr. Aniruddha Mitra, Ms. Sayanti Nandy.

JUDGMENT :

1. This is a suit praying, inter alia, for a decree for khas possession of the suit premises described in the Third Schedule of the plaint and perpetual injunction restraining the defendants and/or their men, agents, servants and/or assigns from alienating, creating third party interests, inducting outsiders, encroaching upon, using, utilizing or howsoever otherwise dealing with the suit premises and further for a mandatory injunction directing the defendants to deliver up vacant and peaceful possession of the suit premises to the plaintiffs.

2. The suit is of 2011. However, it has been recorded by an order dated 13th September, 2017 that despite summons being issued to defendants, save and except defendant nos.1, 2 and 3, no one entered appearance. Record reveals that defendant nos.1,2 and 3 entered appearance on 11th April, 2012 but no written statement has been filed since 2012. Despite the matter being adjourned, no one entered appearance on behalf of the defendants. No written statement has been filed and, therefore, the suit was directed to be taken up as an ‘undefended suit’.

3. Matter was directed to be listed as ‘undefended suit’ on 14th September, 2017 but no one







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top