SAHIDULLAH MUNSHI
Chitrita Dey – Appellant
Versus
Satyanarayan Tripathi – Respondent
1. This is a suit praying, inter alia, for a decree for khas possession of the suit premises described in the Third Schedule of the plaint and perpetual injunction restraining the defendants and/or their men, agents, servants and/or assigns from alienating, creating third party interests, inducting outsiders, encroaching upon, using, utilizing or howsoever otherwise dealing with the suit premises and further for a mandatory injunction directing the defendants to deliver up vacant and peaceful possession of the suit premises to the plaintiffs.
2. The suit is of 2011. However, it has been recorded by an order dated 13th September, 2017 that despite summons being issued to defendants, save and except defendant nos.1, 2 and 3, no one entered appearance. Record reveals that defendant nos.1,2 and 3 entered appearance on 11th April, 2012 but no written statement has been filed since 2012. Despite the matter being adjourned, no one entered appearance on behalf of the defendants. No written statement has been filed and, therefore, the suit was directed to be taken up as an ‘undefended suit’.
3. Matter was directed to be listed as ‘undefended suit’ on 14th September, 2017 but no one
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.