SAHIDULLAH MUNSHI
Sarala Devi Derasaria – Appellant
Versus
Manik Lal Sharma – Respondent
1. The Court : This is an application filed by the plaintiff seeking amendment of the plaint. In the amendment application the plaintiff has stated that amendment of plaint is necessary in view of the issue no.(xvi) which has been framed by this Court to the effect whether the cheques issued by the plaintiff are for the price of the goods delivered by the defendant no.1. Paragraph 3 of the amendment application is set out below:-
“3. That it has become much necessary to amend the plaint on the basis of issues framed particularly in view that the issue no.(xvi) has been framed that whether the cheques issued by the plaintiff for the price of the goods delivered by the defendant no.1.”
2. In support of the prayer for amendment the plaintiff has also stated in paragraph 4 that plaintiff was the manufacturer and dealer of leather hand gloves prior to joining the defendant no.2 as partner of Aasha Kutir Shilpa on 18.09.2004 and she, as proprietress of Aasha Kutir Shilpa, is still manufacturer and dealer of leather hand gloves after retirement of the defendant no.2 as on 1st April, 2006 from the said M/s. Aasha Kutir Shilpa. The plaintiff has no experience at all in iron steel it
Andhra Bank Vs. ABN Amro Bank N.V. & Ors.
Baldev Singh & Ors. Vs. Manohar Singh & Anr.
Brij Gopal Pallod & Ors. Vs. Municipal Council rep. by G. Vasudeva Reddy
J. Samuel & Ors. Vs. Gattu Mahesh & Ors.
Namita Roy Vs. Bengal Greenfield Housing Development Company Ltd.
Rajesh Kumar Aggarwal & Ors. Vs. K.K. Modi & Ors.
Revajeetu Builders and Developers Vs. Narayanaswamy and sons & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.