SOUMEN SEN
Gopi Das Mimani – Appellant
Versus
Monika Daw – Respondent
Soumen Sen, J.
1. The defendant No. 8 has filed an application for rejection of the plaint on the ground that the suit is barred by limitation.
2. The plaintiff has filed a suit on 19th September, 2016 praying, inter alia, for the following reliefs:
(a) A decree for declaration that the decree dated 28th July, 2004 passed in CS No. 406 of 1998 (Vandana Real Estates Pvt. Ltd. & Ors., vs. Smt. Monika Daw & Ors.) is null and void and non est;
(b) The decree dated 28th July, 2004 passed in CS No. 406 of 1998 be set aside and/or cancelled and/or rescinded;
(c) A decree for declaration that the eight several Deeds of Conveyance, particulars whereof are se out in Annexure "D" hereto be adjudged null and void and non est;
(d) A decree for delivery up and cancellation of eight several Deeds of Conveyance, particulars whereof are set out in Annexure "D" hereto;
3. Essential facts constituting the cause of action for filing the suit are:
The plaintiffs have entered into an oral agreement in April/May 1987 with Pranab Chand Daw, the original owner for purchase of 168 Cottahs of land situated at Howrah which is commonly known as Manglahat and has paid a sum of Rs. 5 lakhs towards part conside
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.