SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Cal) 642

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
ASHIS KUMAR CHAKRABORTY, J.
Arkapravo Das - Petitioner
Versus
Madhuparna Das – Respondent
C.O. No. 3221 of 2015
Decided on : 17-03-2017

Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Debanjan Mukherjee and Ms. Debabeena Mukherjee, Advocates.

The main legal point established in the judgment is that the petitioner's application under Section 151 of the Code for enforcement of the order allowing visitation of the minor child was maintainable, and the provisions of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 and the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 did not provide a remedy for the enforcement of the order.

Headnote:

Code of Civil Procedure - Matrimonial Suit - Section 151 - Special Marriage Act, 1954 - Section 27(1)(d) - Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 - Sections 43, 44, 45 - Order 21 - The court discussed the applicability of Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure in enforcing an order allowing visitation of a minor child in a matrimonial suit. The court also considered the provisions of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 and the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 in relation to the enforcement of the order. The court held that the petitioner's application under Section 151 of the Code for enforcement of the order was maintainable and set aside the lower court's decision.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner husband sought enforcement of an order allowing him to avail temporary custody of the minor son for specific holidays. The opposite party wife contested the application, and the lower court rejected both parties' applications. The petitioner appealed the rejection of his application under Section 151 of the Code.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the order allowing temporary custody of the minor son was still in force, and the opposite party wife had not complied with it. The court held that the petitioner's application under Section 151 of the Code for enforcement of the order was maintainable and set aside the lower court's decision.

Issues: Enforcement of order allowing visitation of minor child, applicability of Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, interpretation of provisions of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 and the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner's application under Section 151 of the Code for enforcement of the order was maintainable, and the provisions of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 and the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 did not provide a remedy for the enforcement of the order.

Final Decision: The court set aside the lower court's decision and remitted the matter back to the lower court with a direction to dispose of the application filed by the petitioner husband under Section 151 of the Code, by appointing a Special Officer, preferably a lady advocate for enforcement of the order, if necessary with police help. The lower court was directed to dispose of the application within a period of one month from the date of communication of the order.

JUDGMENT :

Ashis Kumar Chakraborty, J.

This revisional application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order dated June 20, 2015 passed by the learned 15th Additional District Judge at Alipore, South 24-Parganas in Matrimonial Suit No. 07 of 2015 (originally numbered as MAT Suit No. 109 of 2013), in so far as the same rejected the application filed by the petitioner husband under section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure (in short "the Code") for enforcement of an order allowing him to avail temporary custody of the minor son for half of the Summer Vacation, Puja holidays, Kali Puja, Bhatriditiya, Winter Vacation.

2. The short question that falls for consideration of this Court in this application is whether a party to the matrimonial suit can maintain an application under section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (in short "the Code") to execute an order passed by the Court allowing him/her to visit the minor child.

3. The facts leading upto this revisional application may be briefly stated. The petitioner and the opposite party are the husband and wife and out of their wedlock a son was born who is still a minor. In June, 2013 the opposite party filed the aforementioned matrimonial suit, under section 27(1)(d) of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 (in short "the Act of 1954"), against the petitioner husband, before the Court of the learned 3rd Additional District Judge, Alipore, claiming a decree for dissolution of marriage which is contested by the petitioner. The minor child is in the custody of the opposite party wife and in the matrimonial suit the petitioner husband filed an application praying for permanent visitation of the minor child. In the meantime, the opposite party wife filed an application under Section 24 of the Code before the learned District Judge, Alipore, South 24 Parganas praying for, transfer of the matrimonial suit from the Court of the learned 3rd Additional District Judge at Alipore to any other Court at Alipore. During the pendency of the said application before the learned District Judge, by order dated May 31, 2014 the learned 3rd Additional District Judge, Alipore disposed of the application of the petitioner husband for permanent visitation of the minor child by directing that the petitioner will be entitled to avail temporary custody of the minor son for half of the Summer Vacation, Puja Holidays, Kali Puja, Bhatriditiya, Winter Vacation subject to a condition not to take the child out of Kolkata and return him back in safe custody of the opposite party after completion of the half of the holidays. By order dated January 19, 2015 the learned District Judge, Alipore allowed the application filed by the opposite party wife under Section 24 of the Code by withdrawing the matrimonial suit from the Court of the learned 3rd Additional District Judge, Alipore and transferring the same to the Court of the learned 15th Additional District Judge at Alipore, that is, the learned Court below. Thereafter, on February 19, 2015 the opposite party wife filed an application before the learned Court below praying for recalling of the above order dated May 31, 2014 passed by the learned 3rd Additional District Judge, Alipore. In view of the fact that the opposite party wife did not allow the petitioner husband to have the temporary custody of the minor son as directed by the order dated May 31, 2014 he filed an application, under Section 151 of the Code, before the learned Court below seeking enforcement of the said order dated May 31, 2014 by police assistance. On May 16, 2015 the learned Court below passed an order observing that the order dated May 31, 2014 is not complied with by the wife intentionally and the said order must be complied with in letter and spirit failing which, the Court shall take proper step as per law. The opposite party wife contested the application filed by the petitioner husband under Section 151 of the Code and she filed a further application before



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top