JOYMALYA BAGCHI, MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA
Tapas Kumar Palmal – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
Moushumi Bhattacharya, J.
1. This appeal is against a Judgment and order of conviction dated 21st July 2011 and 26th July 2011 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track, 4th Court, Paschim Medinipur, convicting the appellant under section 376 of the Indian Penal Code. By an order dated 5th June 2012 passed by a co-ordinate bench of this Court, the application for bail being CRAN No. 2659 of 2011 was rejected and the appeal was directed to be made ready and placed before the appropriate bench for hearing. The appeal is taken up for hearing today.
2. We have heard learned Counsel for the parties.
The First Information Report:
3. The prosecution case against the appellant is of one Sri Ranjit Kumar Palmal, the de-facto complainant, who filed a written complaint before the officer-in-charge (O.C.) of Keshpur P.S. stating, inter-alia, that on 14th January 2010, on the eve of Poush Sankranti, when he was sitting beside a fire with his wife Tapati, his brother Sri Asit Palmal, and Asit Palmal's wife, he suddenly saw Kalyani Rani Palmal, (the victim and wife of his other brother Sri Sujit Palmal), approach them, distraught and trembling, wearing only a petticoat and a torn
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.