SIDDHARTHA CHATTOPADHYAY, J.

Being unsuccessful in two successive occasions before the learned Trial Court, the appellant/complainant has knocked at the door of this Court for his redress. According to the appellant, learned Trial Court failed to account the evidence of PW 4 and DW 2 in its proper perspectives. Mainly the case of the complainant/appellant before this Court is such that the learned Trial Court lost sight of what is credit bills and so, came to the finding that the respondent had sufficient amount in the concerned bank. Accordingly, he has prayed for setting aside the last impugned judgement of the learned Trial Court and to convict the respondent.

2. The case of the respondent before this Court is such that learned Trial Court had considered all the evidences in its proper perspective and after being remanded by the Hon'ble Court, the learned Trial Court has considered the same and also came to some finding assigning reasons therein. He accordingly prayed for dismissal of this appeal.

3. Sieving out unnecessary details, the prosecution's case in a capsulated form is such that the accused/respondent and the complainant/appellant had business transaction for a