SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Cal) 851

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
SOUMEN SEN, J.
Sri Iswar Mahadeb - Appellant
Vs.
Pradeep Kumar Jain - Respondent
G.A. No. 2920 of 2017 With C.S. No. 194 of 2016
Decided On : 04-09-2017

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appearance : Mr. Supratim Laha, and Mr. Gautom Roy, and Ms. Subhasree Dey

Non-compliance with statutory provisions for payment of rent and arrears under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997 can lead to the striking out of the tenant's defense against delivery of possession.

Headnote:

Striking out Defence - Landlord Tenant Dispute - The court allowed the landlord's application to strike out the defense of the tenant against delivery of possession based on the tenant's failure to pay rent and comply with the provisions of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997.

Fact of the Case:

The landlord filed a suit for eviction against the tenant for non-payment of rent and other charges. The tenant failed to pay rent since August 2014 and did not comply with the statutory provisions for depositing arrears rent and interest.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the tenant failed to comply with the statutory provisions for payment of rent and arrears, and therefore allowed the landlord's application to strike out the defense of the tenant against delivery of possession.

Issues: Non-payment of rent, failure to comply with statutory provisions for depositing arrears rent and interest.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the stringent provisions of Section 7 of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997 and the purpose and object of the amendment made to the 1956 Act, and held that the tenant's non-compliance would defeat the very object and purpose of the amendment.

Final Decision: The court allowed the landlord's application and granted the relief as claimed, striking out the defense of the tenant against delivery of possession.

JUDGMENT :

Soumen Sen, J.

This is an application by the land lord owner for striking out the defence of the defendant tenant against delivery of possession.

2. The plaintiff is the owner of premises No. 1, Wood Street, Kolkata 700016. The defendant was a tenant of Unit G-II measuring about 391.67sq. ft (more or less) on the Ground Floor along with undivided 192 sq. ft. of the Floor Space adjacent thereto being ?th undivided share of 960 sq. ft. on the ground floor of the premises No. 1, Wood Street, Kolkata-700016, P.S. Shakespeare Sarani. The tenancy of the defendant was terminated by a notice to quit dated 21st March, 2016, thereafter, the suit has been filed for eviction. The writ of summons in the suit was duly served upon the respondent defendant on 31st August, 2016. The respondent filed a written statement on 20th December, 2016. The respondent did not pay any rent since August 2014 and also have failed and neglected to pay municipal rates and taxes and maintenance. The plaintiff alleged that in view of failure to pay such payment the defendant became a defaulter under Section 6(1)(b) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act. The defendant neither has deposited the arrears rent nor has filed any application under Section 7(2) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997. The defendant is enjoying the said property for all these period without making payment of any rent and/or occupation charges. The petitioners contend that although the writ of summons along with the copy of the plaint were received by the respondent on 31st August, 2016 but the defendant had failed and neglected to pay to the plaintiff or deposit with the Court all arrears of rent, calculated at the rate at which it was last paid and upto the end of the month previous to that in which the payment is made together with interest at the rate of 10% per annum. It is submitted that the last payment or deposit is required to be made within one month of the service of summons on the tenant. The tenant thereafter is required under the statute to pay to the landlord or deposit with the Court month by month by 15th of each succeeding month a sum equivalent to the rent at that rate. The plaintiff says that the defendant did not deposit the said amount within the aforesaid period of one month nor the defendant had made any application under Section 7(2) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act for extension of time to deposit the arrears rent along with interest. On such fact this application is filed for striking out the defence.

3. In the course of hearing the defendant was asked to produce document to show that the rent either was tendered subsequent to August, 2014 or any application under Section 7(2) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997 has been filed. The defendant, however, has failed to offer any explanation for non-payment of the rent subsequent to August, 2014 or within one month after the writ of summons was served on the defendant. The defendant has failed to produce any document to show that the rent was tendered and refused by the plaintiff. The statute clearly requires the tenant to pay to the landlord or deposit with the Court all arrears of rent along with interest as mentioned in Section 7(1) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, failing which the plaintiff is entitled to an order of striking out the defence against delivery of possession and proceed with the hearing of the suit. The defendant has also failed to show that the landlord did not accept any rent tendered by the tenant within the prescribed period. Moreover, in case of refusal to accept rent the modalities mentioned in Section 21 of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997 is required to be followed. The defendant is unable to produce any document to show that there has been statutory compliance of either of the two provisions. As on date the default of the defendant is established and inexcusable. The provisions under Section 7 of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top