SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Cal) 135

SHIVAKANT PRASAD
Rabindra Nath Kundu – Appellant
Versus
Sudhir Hira – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Partha Pratim Roy
For the Respondents: Mr. Biswarup Biswas

JUDGMENT :

Shivakant Prasad, J.

1. Petitioners have challenged the order dated 13.11.2014 passed by Additional District Judge, Tehatta at Nadia in Miscellaneous Appeal No. 36 of 2013, affirming the order dated 30.9.2013 passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division), Tehatta, Nadia in Miscellaneous Preemption Case No. 14 of 2011.

2. Brief facts leading to this case is that the suit plot being RS and LR Plot No. 2608 appertaining to LR Khatian No. 2501previously belonged to Bijoy Krishna Hira who transferred 11 decimals of land to Santosh Kumar Hira by a registered deed of gift No. 1651 dated 27.4.2004 and delivered possession thereof. Said Santosh Kumar Hira sold 9 decimals out of 11 decimals of land in the suit plot to the petitioner Sudhir Hira vide sale deed No. 6801/09 and delivered possession thereof. Accordingly, the petitioner/preemptor claimed to be a co-sharer in the suit plot. Said Santosh Kumar Hira sold land in various plots including land measuring 1.65 decimals to the opposite parties/preemptee Nos. 1 & 2 stranger purchaser on 09.08.2010 by a registered sale deed No. 6163 of 2010 without knowledge of the preemptor as no notice under Section 5 of the WBLR Act was served upon him


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top