MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA
ITC Limited – Appellant
Versus
JP Morgan Mutual Fund India Private Limited – Respondent
MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA, J.
1. The instant application has been made on behalf of defendant Nos. 6,7,8,9 and 10 for rejection of the plaint and for striking out the names of the said defendants from the array of parties in the suit. The defendant no.1 is the Trustee Company and the defendant No.2 is the Asset Management Company of J.P. Morgan India Treasury Fund and J.P. Morgan India Liquid Fund. Thetreasury fund and liquid fund are debt funds of J.P. Morgan Mutual Fund. The defendant no. 3 is the Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of the Asset Management Company; the defendant nos. 4 and 5 are the head of fixed income and the Associate Fund Manager (debts) respectively of the Asset Management Company and are also fund managers of both the Treasury Fund and the Liquid Fund.
2. Defendant nos.1 and 2 issued the Scheme Information Document on which the plaintiff relied and invested a substantial amount of money in the Treasury Fund and the Liquid Fund. The defendant no.6 is the Associate Director and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Trustee Company (defendant no. 1).
3. The defendant nos. 6 to 10 are the Directors of the Trustee Company (defendant no.1) and ar
Mayar (H.K.) Ltd. and others vs. Owners & Parties
Om Prakash Srivastava Vs. Union of India and Another reported in (2006) 6 SCC 207
State of Haryana Vs. State of Punjab & Another reported in (2004) 12 SCC 673
Coulthard Vs. Disco Mix Club Limited reported in (2000) 1 WLR 707
C.M. Philip Vs. The Registrar of Co-operative Societies and Ors. reported in (2017) 2 KLT 1087
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.