ARINDAM SINHA, J.

1. Petitioner by this writ petition seeks to espouse grievance of himself and others like him in seeking interference with decision of respondent no.1 University to not grant admission to them for post graduate study on the ground they do not possess valid graduate degree. By order dated 15th September, 2017 a co-ordinate Bench had granted leave to petitioner to prosecute the writ petition in representative capacity under Rule 12 of the Writ Rules and directed an interim measure as would appear from extract below:

“I have given my anxious consideration to the rival contentions of the parties. I am not deciding the writ petition on merits today. I quite appreciate the submission of Mr. Choudhuri that if the petitioners have not obtained degrees which are recognized by the University, they are not entitled to be admitted. However, this is one of the issues that this Court will have to decide at the final hearing of the writ petition. If finally the petitioners succeed, they would have lost out the classes and it would be practically impossible for the University to compensate the petitioners at that stage for the loss of classes. Hence, purely as an interim