MIR DARA SHEKO
Sibsankar Bhakat – Appellant
Versus
Radharani Bhakat – Respondent
MIR DARA SHEKO, J.
1. The CO being No. 1904 of 2016 along with CO No. 1332 of 2016 and CO No. 1923 of 2016, were heard simultaneously, since point at issue was the same and identical, as to whether after determination of the arrears of rent and direction of the Court for making its deposit with statutory interest, if default recurred during pendency of the eviction suit in the matter of making such deposit of the sum equivalent to the rent payable in the suit premises, in that case whether said default is condonable, or alternatively, for making such default the defence against delivery of possession is to be struck out. The point at issue was dealt with in details by discussing Various cases cited at the bar in the case of Mithun @ Akhtar Ali v. Sk. Azizul Haque & Ors. in CO. No. 1332 of 2016, effect of which shall also be followed in the instant case.
2. In the case On hand, learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) II Court, Asansol in the suit by determining the arrears of rent directed the petitioners/defendants/tenants (who will be called on hereinafter shortly as the petitioners) to satisfy the arrear amount by 10 equal instalments and also were directed for making payme
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.