SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Cal) 589

HARISH TANDON
Krishna Panda – Appellant
Versus
Radha Gobinda Panda – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Bhaskar Hutait

JUDGMENT :

HARISH TANDON, J.

1. This revisional application is directed against an order dated 13.06.2016 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, 7th Court, Paschim Midnapore in Matrimonial Suit No. 673 of 2015 dismissing an application under section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Admittedly, the marriage was solemnized according to Hindu Rights and Customs and was duly consummated. A minor child was born of the wedlock and it is alleged by the wife/petitioner that she was tortured and assaulted on the demand of dowry. The opposite party filed the said Matrimonial Suit for dissolution of marriage by divorce inter-alia on the ground of desertion and cruelty.

2. The wife/petitioner took out an application under section 24 of the said Act claiming a limine pendente lite not only for herself but also for the minor child together with the litigation cost. It is alleged in the said application that the petitioner has no independent income and is passing her days along with her son in her father's house. It is further alleged that the petitioner has a substantial income of about Rs. 20,000/- per month from various sources and therefore maintenance should be awarded to her to th








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top