2019 Supreme(Cal) 7
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA, J.
AMRITA BAZAAR PATRIKA PRIVATE LIMITED - Appellant
Vs.
UNITED BANK OF INDIA AND ANOTHER - Respondents
Civil Order No. 4331 of 2018
Decided On : 20-02-2019
Suddhasatva Banerjee, Adv., Sarathi Dasgupta, Adv., Pratik Ghose, Adv., Avishek Roy Chowdhury, Adv., Basudeb Mukherjee, Adv., Jayabrata Basu Ray, Adv.
The entitlement of employees to gratuity and interest on delayed payment flowed from a settlement order and Section 4 of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. The tribunal had jurisdiction to direct the payment of interest on gratuity, and the employer's challenge was barred by the principles of waiver and acquiescence.
Headnote:
Interest on Gratuity - Jurisdiction of Tribunal - Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Section 7
Fact of the Case:
The employer challenged the order of the Debts Recovery Tribunal directing the disbursement of interest on delayed payment of gratuity to the employees. The employer argued that the tribunal did not have jurisdiction to adjudicate the quantum of interest payable on gratuity and that the entitlement to gratuity did not arise as the employees did not make a valid claim under Section 7 of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the entitlement of the employees to gratuity and interest on delayed payment of gratuity flowed from a settlement order dated February 11, 2004, and Section 4 of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. The court held that the tribunal had jurisdiction to direct the payment of interest on gratuity and that the employer's challenge was barred by the principles of waiver and acquiescence.
Issues: Jurisdiction of the tribunal to adjudicate the quantum of interest payable on gratuity, entitlement of employees to gratuity and interest on delayed payment, and the applicability of the principles of waiver and acquiescence.
Ratio Decidendi: The entitlement of employees to gratuity and interest on delayed payment flowed from a settlement order and Section 4 of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. The tribunal had jurisdiction to direct the payment of interest on gratuity, and the employer's challenge was barred by the principles of waiver and acquiescence.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the employer's challenge, affirming the orders of the tribunals below.
Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.
1. The present challenge under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been taken out against an order of the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata, affirming an order of the Debts Recovery Tribunal, whereby it had directed the Chairman, Assets Sale Committee to disburse the interest on delayed payment of gratuity to the employees as per the report of the Chartered Accountant, L.B. Jha & Co. The said disbursement was directed not to exceed forty per cent of the sale proceeds, that is, Rs. 15,00,10,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Crore Ten Thousand) and in any case not to exceed the outer limit fixed, that is, Rs. 20 crore, for the employees.
2. The said order of the tribunal was based on a previous consent order dated February 11, 2004, recording a settlement arrived at between the parties to several original proceedings pending before the Kolkata Debts Recovery Tribunal. A consortium of five banks, out of which the present opposite party no. 1 was one, the present petitioner, namely, Amrita Bazaar Patrika (the employer) and its sister concerns, who were the principal borrowers and the guarantors, were parties to the said proceedings, although the employees, represented by the opposite party no. 2, were not.
3. The crux of the agreement between the parties was recorded in paragraph no. 5 of the said consent order dated February 11, 2004, which is set out below:
“(5) The parties have agreed to settle the decretal amounts of United Bank of India (T.A. No. 18 of 1997, T.A. No. 19 of 1997) and the claims of the applicant banks in OA No. 192 of 1997, OA No. 193 of 1997 and O.A. No. 275 of 1997 in the following manner:
(a) The consortium banks have agreed to settle their respective claims against the defendants by accepting the following amounts by 30th June, 2004.
(i) Rs. 2439.65 lakhs by United Bank of India
(ii) Rs. 304.35 lakhs by Canara Bank
(iii) Rs. 303.13 lakhs by Bank of Baroda
(iv) Rs. 228.16 lakhs by Allahabad Bank
(v) Rs. 230.67 lakhs by Punjab National Bank
(vi) Rs. 57 lacs towards legal expenses incurred by the consortium banks.
Besides the above, payment of Rs. 2439.65 lacs to be received by United Bank of India:
United Bank of India will also receive Rs. 150 lacs towards settlement of its dues in respect of Allahabad Patrika Ltd. in O.A. 275 of 1997 out of the sale proceeds. In addition to the same, the United Bank of India, the applicant herein will also receive the cost of publication, payment of valuers' remuneration etc. incurred by it in connection with the sale of the assets/properties out of the sale proceeds.
(b) A committee consisting of the Receiver Mr. K.P. Mishra already appointed by the Tribunal and one representative from each of the applicants and one representative representing the three companies viz. Amrita Bazar Patrika Pvt. Ltd., Allahabad Patrika Ltd. and Jugantar Ltd. and one representative from defendant No. 4 to 9 will take possession of all the hypothecated assets and mortgaged properties being the securities of the applicant banks and they will dispose of in the best possible manner as expeditiously as possible. The quorum of the committee will be four members present and any decision of the majority will be binding on all the parties. The receiver will be the Chairman of the Committee.
(c) Out of the sale proceeds of hypothecated assets and mortgaged properties as contained in Annexure I & II of to-day's joint petition the committee would pay
(i) 40% to the applicant banks (consortium banks):
(ii) 40% of the sale proceeds of the assets will be paid to the workers/employees towards their dues to the maximum extent of Rs. 15 crore;
(iii) 20% of the sale proceeds will be utilised by the said three companies for meeting various dues of other creditors.
(d) After the dues of workers/employees to the extent of Rs. 15 crores are paid the sharing of the sale proceeds between the applicants (consortium banks) and the three companies (Amrita Bazar Patrika Pvt. Ltd., Allahabad Pat