SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DEBI PROSAD DEY
Minor Seema Mahato – Appellant
Versus
Alok Mahato – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Dhruba Mukherjee.
For the Respondent: Mr. Ayan Basu.

JUDGMENT :

DEBI PROSAD DEY, J.

1. This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed challenging the order dated November, 26, 2015 of Misc. Case No. 166 of 2009 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, first court Purulia whereby and whreunder learned Magistrate has rejected the application of the petitioner for conducting the DNA test of the opposite party no. 1 to ascertain the parentage of the petitioner.

2. Affidavit of service reveals that opposite party no. 1 refused to accept the copy of the application along with annexure thereof. Learned Advocate for the State Mr. Ayan Basu is present. The factual matrix of the case under reference is that the mother of the minor petitioner lodged a complaint in writing with the Purulia (M) police station alleging that the opposite party no. 1 had promised to marry her and on the promise of such marriage allured her to cohabit with him on several occasions, as a consequence of which she became pregnant. The opposite party no. 1 however being aware of the pregnancy of the mother of the petitioner, refused to marry her and accordingly such written complaint was f

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top