SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Cal) 470

SAHIDULLAH MUNSHI
Sankar Prasad Mukherjee – Appellant
Versus
Maulana Abul Kalam Ajad University – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
Srijib Chakraborty, J.D. Roy, Kallol Basu, Nilanjan Pal, Suranjan Das Gupta, Advocates.

JUDGMENT :

1. This writ petition along with other two being W.P. No. 5867(W) of 2018 and W.P. No. 5868(W) of 2018 have been assigned before this Court on the request for reference by the Hon'ble Single Bench.

2. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties extensively this writ petition has come up for final decision to consider whether the orders impugned in this writ petition issued by the respondent no.5 are in gross violation of the authority of the Hooghly Engineering and Technology College Service, Leave and Conduct, Rules as also the Hooghly Engineering and Technology College Society (HETCS). A prayer has therefore, been made for setting aside and for quashing the show cause notice dated 26th September, 2017, the order of suspension dated 3rd October, 2017 and a decision forming a three-member enquiry committee dated 26th September, 2017 to look into the purported charges levelled in the show cause issued by the respondent no.4 and the report of the purported enquiry committee dated 27th October, 2017 and to allow the petitioner to resume his duties in the post in question.

3. The termination letter dated 23rd March, 2018 has been issued by Dr. Abhijit Maity, Secretary of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top