SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Cal) 481

SUBHASIS DASGUPTA
Samrat Bhowmik – Appellant
Versus
Chanda & Company – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
Anirban Roy, Suman Sehanabis, Advocates.

JUDGMENT :

1. This is a case where maintainability of two complaint cases, instituted for commission of offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, was challenged taking the grounds of limitation, as provided under Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, for the limitation provided under the Act having been stretched by an order of learned Magistrate authorising complaint to refile the same to the competent court having jurisdiction to try the offence, both the Revisional Applications were heard together by the consent of the parties on the simple ground that in both the cases a common order passed by Magistrate, was subjected to challenge.

2. The impugned order dated 17th September, 2018 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, 3rd Court Cooch Behar in Criminal Revision No. 12 of 2017 and criminal revision No. 13 of 2017 respectively dismissing the revisional applications and thereby affirming the order dated 14.02.2017 passed by learned ACJM Mathabhanga in CR 8 of 2015 and CR 9 of 2015 is the subject matter of challenge in this revisional application under Section 482 Cr. P.C.

3. Learned advocate for the revisionist covering both the cases referred herein abo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top