JUDGMENT :

1. Above mentioned two appeals are preferred by two appellants assailing the judgment and order of conviction dated 26.9.2000 passed by Sri Dulal Chandra De, WBHJS, Judge, Calcutta, 3rd Special Court at Calcutta in case No. 4 of 1989 convicting the appellant of offences punishable under Sections 120B/420/468/ 471 of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing them to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two years and pay a fine of Rs. 2000/- in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months for each of the offence punishable under Sections 420/468 read with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, however, no separate sentence on conviction under Section 471 of the Indian Penal Code was passed. Grounds taken is that the learned Judge relied on inadmissible evidence and the impugned judgment is bad in law and in fact.

2. Prosecution case in brief is that in response to the requisition sent by Deputy Commissioner of Police Headquarter Kolkata the Directorate of Employment Exchange sponsored 1200 candidates for preliminary selection against the vacancies in the post of constable of Calcutta Police Force. The candidates who were requested to sponsor belonging to different Districts