SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Cal) 664

PROTIK PRAKASH BANERJEE
Md. Manzer Aqeel – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.S. Chattopadhyay, U.S. Chattopadhyay, Santanu Maji, Pronoy Basak, Subir Sanyal, Ratul Biswas, Bhaskar Prasad Vaisya, Gourav Das, Biswabrata Basu Mallick, Advocates.

JUDGMENT :

1. Affidavit-In-Opposition, Reply and written notes of argument are taken on record.

2. After mature consideration, on instructions, learned advocate for the petitioners abandons prayer (b) of the writ petition. Accordingly, no certiorari is issued so far as the records of the recruitment process are concerned.

3. This writ petition has been instituted principally for the following reliefs:

"(a) Issue a writ of or in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent authorities directing the respondent authorities to immediately publish the full panel of the recruitment process arising out of notification dated 26.09.2016 bearing memo no.2202/BPE/2016;

(b) A writ in the nature of mandamus directing an independent investigating committee comprising of legal and academic luminaries to enquire and investigate into the recruitment process arising out of Notification dated 26.09.2016 bearing memo no.2202/BPE/2016;"

4. At the outset, Mr. Sanyal, learned advocate appearing for the Board, Mr. Vaisya, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the State leading Mr. Das and M

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top