HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA
Sony Kabushiki Kaisha – Appellant
Versus
Mahaluxmi Textile Mills – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J. - The instant application is at the instance of the plaintiff in a suit for permanent injunction and is directed against an order being no. 97 dated April 30, 2011 passed by the learned Additional District Judge 7th court at Alipore in Title Suit No. 129 of 1997 whereby the application for amendment of plaint was rejected.
2. The petitioner claims to be the registered proprietor in India of the trade mark "SONY" in respect of electronic goods. The products manufactured by the petitioner with the trade mark "SONY" are available and marketed throughout India. SONY also forms the most distinctive feature of petitioner's corporate name and trading style. Investigation carried out by the petitioner revealed that the opposite party was using the trade mark "SONY" for hosiery goods. The opposite party is marketing and selling the hosiery goods under trade mark "SONY" with the object of deceiving the public and leading them to believe that in purchasing the goods offered for sale by the opposite party they were buying the goods manufactured by the petitioner.
3. The instant suit was filed sometimes in the year 1997. The petitioner claims that at that poin
Bharat Karsondas Thakkar vs. Kiran Construction Company and others
Carlsberg Breweries vs. Som Distilleries and Breweries Ltd.
Rajkumar Gurawara vs. S.K. Sarwagi and Company Private Limited and another
Ramdev Food Products (P) Ltd. vs. Arvindbhai Rambhai Patel and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.