SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Cal) 220

SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA
Saani Das – Appellant
Versus
State Of West Bengal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Anup Dasgupta, Advocate, Soumitra Bandyopadhyay, Advocate, Subhasis Bandyopadhyay, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J. - The writ petitioner has challenged the alleged refusal by respondent no.4, the District Sub-Registrar, to register a sale deed dated December 30, 2019 in favour of the petitioner.

2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner, by placing reliance on annexure P1 at page 24 of the writ petition, that the present and proposed user of the plots sought to be sold was mentioned by the petitioner in the application for obtaining the valuation for the purpose of registration as "Jal/Jaljami".

3. The e-Assessment Slip issued by the Directorate of Registration and Stamp Revenue, Government of West Bengal, however, indicates that the online form submitted by the petitioner was tampered with, by writing the word "Bastu" over the description given by the petitioner, by pen. It is argued by the petitioner that such arbitrary alteration of the proposed user as well as present user of the plots-in-question was arbitrary and illegal and beyond the jurisdiction of the authorities.

4. It is submitted that 'Jal/Jaljami' indicates that the land is used for agricultural purposes, which is also reflected from the extracts of information taken from the rec

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top