SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Cal) 235

MADHUMATI MITRA
Nityananda Paul – Appellant
Versus
State Of West Bengal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Amit Dey, Advocate, Sayanti Santra, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Madhumati Mitra, J. - In the year 2015, the petitioners approached for quashing of the First Information Report being Regent Park Police Station, Case No.114 of 2015, dated 01.06.2015 under Sections 153A/295A/34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 3(X)/3(XV) of The Scheduled Castes and The Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, pending before the Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alipore, South 24 Parganas (ACGR-3291/15).

2. During the pendency of the present revisional application, the petitioner no.1, viz.Nityananda Paul expired. Petitioner nos.2 and 3 are the daughter and son of petitioner no.1.

3. The background aspects of the matter, so far relevant for the present purpose, may be mentioned, in brief, as follows:

4. Petitioner no.2 and opposite party got married in the year 2013. It was alleged that petitioner no.2 was subjected to physical and mental torture since her marriage by her husband (opposite party no.2) and her in laws. Petitioner no.2 lodged an F.I.R. being the Regent Park Police Station Case No.214 of 2014, dated 04.10.2014, under Section 498A/120B of the Indian Penal Code. Investigation of that case culminated into submi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top