SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Cal) 252

JAY SENGUPTA
Jitendra S Choudhari – Appellant
Versus
State Of West Bengal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Dhiraj Trivedi, Advocate, Vikash Choubey, Advocate, Satadru Lahiri, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Jay Sengupta, J. - This is an application challenging a judgment and order dated 12th June, 2018 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-II, City Session Court, Bichar Bhawan, Calcutta, in Criminal Revision No.78 of 2016, thereby affirming the judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 14th Court, Calcutta in TR No. 1369 of 2009 under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

2. An application under section 5 of the Limitation Act has also been filed praying for condonation of delay of about 500 days in preferring this revision.

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits as follows. For the purported dishonour of a cheque of Rs.15 lakhs, the learned trial court convicted the petitioner under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and directed him to pay a sum of Rs.30,00,000/- as compensation and to suffer imprisonment till the rising of the Court. This conviction and sentence was affirmed by the learned Appellate Court. There was a delay of about 504 days in approaching this Court in revision. The delay has been explained at paragraphs 2 and 3 of the application un

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top