SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Cal) 293

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Sahidullah Munshi, Subhasis Dasgupta, JJ.
Mazidul Miah @ Mia And Others - Appellants
Versus
State Of West Bengal - Respondent
CRA No. 247 of 2006
Decided On : 25-06-2020

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Arindam Jana, Advocate, Mrs. Sreyoshi Bhoumick, Advocate, Mr. Hironmoy Paik, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Arun Kumar Maity, Ld. A.P.P., Ms. Sreeparna Das, Advocate and Mr. N.P. Agarwala, Advocate, for the State.

The burden of proving the guilt of an accused is on the prosecution, but there may be certain facts pertaining to a crime that can be known only to the accused, and if he does not explain them, it is a strong circumstance pointing to his guilt based on those facts.

Headnote:

Conviction - Homicidal Death - Section 498A/302/34 I.P.C. - The deceased suffered death in her in-law's house by hanging. The prosecution case was based on dissatisfaction of the accused persons for the black complexion of the deceased victim. The court found the accused husband guilty of causing homicidal death to the deceased wife by strangulation due to his dissatisfaction over her black complexion. The conviction and sentence of the accused mother-in-law under Section 498A/34 I.P.C. was modified, and she was acquitted for the offence under Section 302/34 I.P.C.

Fact of the Case:

The deceased, a second daughter, suffered unnatural death in her in-law's house about seven months after her marriage. The prosecution established that the deceased was subjected to cruelty and torture by her in-law's members due to her black complexion. The delay in lodging the F.I.R. was explained by the distance between the deceased's house and the in-law's house, and the grief and frustration of the de-facto complainant/father.

Finding of the Court:

The court found the accused husband guilty of causing homicidal death to the deceased wife by strangulation due to his dissatisfaction over her black complexion. The accused mother-in-law was acquitted for the offence under Section 302/34 I.P.C. but convicted under Section 498A/34 I.P.C.

Issues: The court addressed the delay in lodging the F.I.R., the non-production of the offending weapon, and the post-conduct of the mother-in-law. It also considered the application of Section 106 of the Evidence Act and the burden of proof on the accused.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the accused husband failed to offer any explanation for the injuries caused to his wife, leading to the conclusion that the death occurred in his custody. The court also emphasized that non-production of the offending weapon did not weaken the prosecution case, and the delay in lodging the F.I.R. was explained and deemed insignificant.

Final Decision: The accused husband's conviction and sentence under Section 498A/302/34 I.P.C. were upheld, while the accused mother-in-law was acquitted for the offence under Section 302/34 I.P.C. and convicted under Section 498A/34 I.P.C.

JUDGMENT

Subhasis Dasgupta, J. - This appeal found its emergence after it was preferred by accused persons/appellants against the judgment and order of conviction, and sentence, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Cooch Behar, in Sessions Case No. 74/2 giving rise to Sessions Trial No. 4(12)04, convicting the accused persons/appellants under Section 498A/302/34 I.P.C., and sentencing them thereunder to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three (3) years with fine of Rs. 5,000/-(Rupees Five Thousand) each, with default stipulation to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six (6) months each under Section 498A I.P.C., and to suffer imprisonment for life with fine of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) each, and in default to pay fine further rigorous imprisonment for six (6) months each under Section 302/34 I.P.C.

2. We feel inclined to mention the factual scenario of this case precisely as established and highlighted by the prosecution, discernable from the witnesses examined during trial, that the deceased being the second daughter of the de-facto complainant/father was put to suffer death in her in-law's house by hanging about seven (7) months after her marriage.

3.Admittedly, victim was given marriage with accused/appellant no. 1 Mazidul Miah on 16.10.1997, according to mohammedan rites and customs satisfying the demand of accused persons, like by paying cash of Rs. 11,000/- (Rupees Eleven Thousand), silver ornaments of three descriptions along with one Hero cycle and other valuables.

4. After visit to her in-law's house, deceased victim was put to suffer cruelty, oppression and ill-treatment by her in-law's members, including her accused husband for her black complexion. She was not loved by family members of in-law's house, and frequently abused her with a threat that accused husband would be given marriage shortly after repealing her marriage and driving her out of the matrimonial home.

5. The in-law's members while causing ill-treatment upon victim made her understand just three days after her marriage for staying in a cow shed, expressing their dissatisfaction on the ground of her black complexion. Accused husband beat her physically with cycle chain while causing physical torture upon the deceased victim. She was attempted to be killed. Deceased victim reported everything to her parents about the torture and cruelty, she received in her in-law's house, when she visited her paternal house on several occasions.

6.The de-facto complainant/father sent his daughter/victim to her in-law's house on 11.06.1998, after persuading her to withstand such torture inflicted upon her, for her future benefit upon realization of weak financial condition of her father. The mother of deceased victim, when visited her in-law's house on 20 th June, 1998, the victim daughter informed her narrating the plight of her physical assault committed upon her by her in-law's members. The father/complainant learnt everything after his wife had returned to house. The eldest son-in-law of the de-facto complainant/father on 24 th June, 1998, visited to the house of de-facto complainant and informed de-facto complainant that victim daughter had been put to suffer death by hanging with use of rope. Having received such information, de-facto complainant/father rushed to the in-law's house of his deceased daughter, when victim daughter's body had already been sent to P.S. for holding post-mortem examination.

7. The police inquest was held. Two pieces of light green coloured tape recorder chord, one of which measuring about 2.5 ft. long, and another being 8 ft. long, were seized during investigation, alleging the same to have been used in the instant murder, as weapon of assault. The dead body of deceased was subjected to autopsy after due consultation of inquest report and F.S.L. report of viscera of deceased. The Autopsy Surgeon opined that the death of the deceased was due to asphyxia as effect of strangulation by ligature, which was ante-mortem and homicid

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top