2020 Supreme(Cal) 475
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
SUBRATA TALUKDAR, J.
Suman Kundu & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
The State – Respondents
W.P. No. 26035 (W) of 2018, P.A. With W. P. No. 4061 (W) of 2019
Decided on : 01-07-2020
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Dilip Kumar Samanta, Mr. Biswapriya Samanta, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. Amal Kumar Sen, Mr. Santanu Mitra, Ms. Ashima Das (Sil), Mr. Amal Kumar Sen, Mr. Santanu Mitra, Mr. Lal Mohan Basu, Mr. B.K. Samanta, Adv.
The plenary powers of the Transport Department to formulate a fresh alignment and terminus point consistent with the available infrastructure to suit public convenience.
Headnote:
Route Shifting - Motor Vehicles Act - Section 80(3), Section 71(3)(a), Section 68(3)(ca) - The court discussed the action of the State Respondents to shift the terminus of the permanent stage carriage Route No. 45 and the legality of the resolutions and notifications regarding the change of alignment and terminus points. The court found that the Notification dated 6th February, 2019 stood in conformity with the plenary powers of the Transport Department to formulate a fresh alignment and terminus point consistent with the available infrastructure to suit public convenience.
Fact of the Case:
The case involved the challenge to the action of the State Respondents to shift the terminus of the permanent stage carriage Route No. 45 from Airport Gate No. 2 to Haldiram Bus Terminus.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the Notification dated 6th February, 2019 stood in conformity with the plenary powers of the Transport Department to formulate a fresh alignment and terminus point consistent with the available infrastructure to suit public convenience.
Issues: The issues involved the legality of the resolutions and notifications regarding the change of alignment and terminus points of the route.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Notification dated 6th February, 2019 was in conformity with the plenary powers of the Transport Department to formulate a fresh alignment and terminus point consistent with the available infrastructure to suit public convenience.
Final Decision: WP No. 26035 (W) of 2018 and WP No. 4061 (W) of 2019 stand dismissed. There will be no order as to costs.
JUDGMENT :
1. The short question arising for consideration in both the above noted analogous writ petitions is the action of the State Respondents to shift the terminus of the permanent stage carriage Route No. 45 (for short the said Route) from Airport Gate No. 2 to Haldiram Bus Terminus.
2. In WP No. 26035 (W) of 2018 (for short WP I), Mr. Samanta, Learned Counsel appearing for the writ petitioners in both the petitions, raises the question as to whether the Regional Transport Authority (RTA), Kolkata Region, acted within jurisdiction by resolving at its Board Meeting held on 15th of November, 2018 to change the alignment as well as one of the termini points of the said route resulting in effect in the creation of a new route altogether.
3. Mr. Samanta argues that any change and/or variation in alignment is subject to the conditions specified in Section 80 (3) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (as amended and referred to henceforth as the MV Act). Learned Counsel additionally points out that the meeting of the RTA Board on 15th November, 2018 shows the presence of a non-member of the RTA Board, thus rendering the resolution at the meeting voidable.
4. It is also submitted that the legal infirmity attached to the resolution dated 15th November, 2018 (supra), vitiates the subsequent RTA Board resolution dated 5th December, 2018 inasmuch as the subsequent resolution expressly ratifies the previous resolution without removing the defects of the former. The subsequent resolution dated 5th December, 2018 refers to the change of alignment and a terminus of the said route by the Transport Department, Government of West Bengal by issuance of a fresh Notification.
5. Mr. Samanta also appears in support of WP 4061 (W) of 2019 (WP II). The challenge in WP II is to the Notification of the Transport Department, Government of West Bengal dated 6th of February, 2019. By the impugned Notification, in exercise of powers under Article 162 of the Constitution of India, the alignment and, consequently one of the termini points of the said route has been changed from Airport Gate No.2 to Kaikhali Bus Stand (Haldiram). The Notification dated 6th February, 2019 was the culminating point of the process of change of alignment and one of the termini points of the said Route No.45 triggered by the first resolution of the RTA Board dated 15th November, 2018.
6. It is argued that the said Route was formulated by the State Government in exercise of powers under Section 71 (3)(a) of the MV Act and could be not be reformulated partially. It is contended that since the said Route is notified under Section 71 of the MV Act for long, the introduction of a new and partial Route alignment and terminus by the impugned Notification dated 6th February, 2019 is de hors the legally accepted finality attached to notified routes. The new route, in short, as sought to be ushered in by the Notification dated 6th February, 2019, is more in the nature of a technical exercise to make the Kaikhali (Haldiram) Bus Stand operational and, less an exercise catering to public convenience. Accordingly, the petitioners seek a roll back of both the resolutions of the RTA Board, Kolkata as challenged in WP I and the Notification of the Transport Department, Government of West Bengal, as challenged in WP II.
7. Appearing for the State Respondents in both WP I and WP II, Mr. Sen, Learned Additional Government Pleader (AGP), submits that the exercise by the State Respondents culminated in the said route being newly and lawfully formulated under the Notification dated 6th February, 2019. Referring to Section 68 (3) (ca) of the MV Act, Learned AGP submits that the Notification dated 6th February, 2019 subsumes all administrative circulars previously issued including those circulars under Rule 182 of the WB Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 (for short, the 1989 Rules), which have the effect of altering only the halting points of routes. The formulation of the new alignment and terminus point is a step take