2019 Supreme(Cal) 926
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
MADHUMATI MITRA, J.
Sri Ujjwal Agarwal & Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
Ms. Ekta Agarwal - Respondent
C.R.R. No. 681 of 2019
Decided On : 14-08-2019
For the Petitioners: Mr. Sourav Chatterjee, Mr. S. Lahiri, Mr. N. Banerjee.
For the Opposite Party : Mr. Dhiraj Trivedi, Mr. A. Singh.
Interim orders under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005 are subject to final adjudication and cannot be interfered with at an early stage.
Headnote:
Maintenance - Domestic Violence - Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005 - Section 12, Section 29, Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner challenged the order directing payment of interim maintenance to the wife and minor children under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the impugned order was interim in nature and subject to final adjudication on the main application. The appellate court granted interim maintenance and liberty to the petitioner to prove his income.
Issues: Quantum of maintenance, capacity of the petitioner to pay, justification of the maintenance amount
Ratio Decidendi: The impugned order was interim and subject to final adjudication. The court cannot assume the jurisdiction of the trial court and delve into the factual merit of the case at this stage.
Final Decision: The application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
Madhumati Mitra, J.
1. This is an application under Sections 397/401 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 16th February, 2019 passed by the Learned Chief Judge, City Sessions Court, Calcutta in Criminal Appeal No.58 of 2018, thereby directing the petitioner to pay interim maintenance amounting to Rs.12,000/- each to the two minor children and Rs.20,000/- to the wife/opposite party per month from May, 2018 till disposal of the Miscellaneous Case pending before the Learned Magistrate.
2. The petitioner having been dissatisfied with the judgment and order passed in Appeal has preferred the present application.
3. The facts which are essential for disposal of the present application are as follows:-
4. Present opposite party is the legally married wife of the present petitioner no.1 and petitioner nos.2 and 3 are the parents in law of opposite party. On 16.01.2018, the opposite party filed a petition under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005, against the petitioners before the Learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Calcutta being Misc. Case No.03/2018. The Learned Trial Magistrate posted the said Miscellaneous Case No.03/2018 for ex parte hearing on 16.02.2018 as the petitioners refused to accept the summons.
5. On 11th May, 2018 the Learned Trial Court disposed of the said Miscellaneous Case directing the present petitioner no.1 to pay a sum of Rs.55,000/- in total per month to the opposite party. Petitioner stated that he was not aware about the Misc.Case filed by the opposite party. On 28.06.2018 petitioner no.1 received the copy of the order passed by the Learned Magistrate ex parte.
6. The petitioners had challenged the order passed by the Learned Magistrate in Misc. Case No.3 of 2018 by preferring Criminal Appeal being No.58 of 2018 under Section 29 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act along with an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 before the Learned Chief Judge, City Sessions Court, Calcutta, praying for setting aside the said ex parte order dated 11.05.2018. Learned Chief Judge City Sessions Court allowed the said appeal on contest and set aside the order dated 11.05.2018 passed by the Learned Magistrate in Misc. Case No.03/2018. In the said order the appellant No.1 has been given an opportunity to prove his income and all the appellants have been given opportunity to counter the allegations levelled against them by the respondent no.1.
7. The order passed in Criminal Appeal No.58 of 2018 is as under:-
“The appellant no.1 is directed to pay an interim maintenance amounting to Rs.12,000/- each to the minor children and Rs.20,000/- to the wife from the date of the impugned order i.e. from May, 2018 till disposal of the misc. case.
All the appellants are directed to restrain themselves from committing any Domestic Violence or any such acts which leads to Domestic Violence.
All the appellants are directed to allow the respondent no.1 to reside in a portion of Madhusudan Apartment, Flat no.A/7, 5th Floor, P-18, Dobson Lane, Howrah or arrange an alternative accommodation to the respondent no.1 or pay Rs.10,000/- per month for the alternative accommodation to the respondent no.1.
Amount of Rs.50,000/- paid by the appellant no.1 to the respondent no.1 during the proceeding of the appeal will be considered as the cost of the appeal borne by the respondent no.1/wife and that too will not be deducted from the interim maintenance or from alternative accommodation.
Arrear interim maintenance will be paid by the appellant no.1 to the respondent no.1 along with current interim maintenance in more or less four equal installments.
Both the appellants and respondent are directed to appear before the ld. Lower Court on 28.02.2019.
Ld. Lower court is directed to give opportunity to the appellants to file objection and thereafter, give opportunity to all the parties to produce witnesses and documents af