SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Cal) 519

JAY SENGUPTA
Nusrat Khatun – Appellant
Versus
Abu Barkat – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Tapodip Gupta, Advocate, Sreeyashee Biswas, Advocate, Benajir Hasna, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Jay Sengupta, J. - This is an application challenging an order dated 28.05.2018 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 3rd Court, Jangipur, Murshidabad, in Maintenance Case being M.R. Case No.338 of 2017, (T.R. No.1594/2017), under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

2. Affidavit-Of-Service furnished by the petitioner be kept on record.

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner/wife submits as follows. The petitioner/wife got married with the opposite party/husband on 09.11.2011. Some time after the marriage, the opposite party and his family members pressurized her to bring Rs.3,00,000/- as dowry from her father''s house. They were also dissatisfied with the dowry articles given by the parents of the petitioner/wife. The opposite party/husband and other in-laws started inflicting cruelty on the petitioner/wife. There was an attempt to kill the foetus in the petitioner''s womb by kicking on her abdomen. The petitioner/wife fell ill and was compelled to take shelter in her father''s house. The petitioner/wife was a teacher in a high school and was earning about Rs.35,000/- per month. The amount granted by the learned Trial Court as interim maint

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top