SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Cal) 527

JAY SENGUPTA
Swarnamoyee Patra – Appellant
Versus
State Of West Bengal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Amitabha Ghosh, Advocate, Saswata Gopal Mukheji, Advocate, Sayanti Santra, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Jay Sengupta, J. - This is an application seeking an expeditious disposal of a trial under section 354 of the Penal Code and under section 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act 2012.

2. Affidavit of service filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record.

3. Despite service of notice upon the accused/opposite party no.2, no one appears on his behalf.

4. Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits as follows. In the present case, although the FIR was lodged on 20.11.2017 and a charge sheet was submitted on 29.01.2018, till date, the proceeding could not be concluded. The examination of the first witness is going on. After obtaining bail on 01.02.2018, the accused/opposite party started influencing the witnesses of the case and putting pressure on the victim and her family in respect of the pending proceeding. If the proceeding is not completed at the earliest, the best evidence would not be produced in this case.

5. I have heard the submissions of the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties and have perused the revision petition.

6. It appears that the impugned proceeding has remained pending for an unduly long period, e

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top