SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Cal) 165

JAY SENGUPTA
Srejany Samaddar (das) – Appellant
Versus
Kuntal Samaddar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Amitabha Ghosh, Advocate, Sk Sujauddin, Advocate, Indrajit Dey, Advocate, Debanjan Mukherjee, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Jay Sengupta, J. - The Court:

2. This is an application challenging an order dated 29.08.2019 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Barasat, North 24 Parganas in Criminal Revision No. C. R. 68 of 2019.

3. Affidavit of service filed by the petitioner is taken on record.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits as follows. The petitioner wife was driven out of her matrimonial home when she was in the family way. The husband is employed in a pharmaceutical company and earns about Rs.50,000/- per month. She filed an application under section 125 of the Code claiming maintenance for herself and was awarded a sum of Rs. 3500/- as an interim measure. In the meantime, a child was born and is aged about 3 years at present. After necessary modifications, the learned Magistrate was pleased to award Rs.3500/- to the wife and Rs.2000/- to the minor child as interim maintenance allowances payable per month. Being aggrieved by this, the husband / opposite party preferred a revision before the learned Sessions Court. The revisional application was accompany with an application for condonation of delay. Without even condoning the delay in preferring the revision, by

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top