JAY SENGUPTA
Srejany Samaddar (das) – Appellant
Versus
Kuntal Samaddar – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Jay Sengupta, J. - The Court:
2. This is an application challenging an order dated 29.08.2019 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Barasat, North 24 Parganas in Criminal Revision No. C. R. 68 of 2019.
3. Affidavit of service filed by the petitioner is taken on record.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits as follows. The petitioner wife was driven out of her matrimonial home when she was in the family way. The husband is employed in a pharmaceutical company and earns about Rs.50,000/- per month. She filed an application under section 125 of the Code claiming maintenance for herself and was awarded a sum of Rs. 3500/- as an interim measure. In the meantime, a child was born and is aged about 3 years at present. After necessary modifications, the learned Magistrate was pleased to award Rs.3500/- to the wife and Rs.2000/- to the minor child as interim maintenance allowances payable per month. Being aggrieved by this, the husband / opposite party preferred a revision before the learned Sessions Court. The revisional application was accompany with an application for condonation of delay. Without even condoning the delay in preferring the revision, by
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.