IN THE HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.
Naresh Kumar Poddar - Appellant
Versus
Union Of India - Respondent
W.P.O. No. 493 of 2019
Decided On : 05-01-2021
Companies Act - Disqualification of Director - Section 164(2), Section 167(1)(a) - [SUMMARY OF ACT SECTIONS]
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a director of a Private Limited Company, challenged the disqualification of his Director Identification Number (DIN) and Digital Signature Certificate (DSC) under Section 164(2) and Section 167(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013. The petitioner argued that the disqualification was premature and untenable at law.
Finding of the Court:
The Court held that the operation of the 2014 Amendment to Section 164(2) and the 2018 Amendment to the proviso of Section 167(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013 are prospective in nature. The Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the deactivation of DIN by virtue of the notice dated April 7, 2017.
Issues: The legal questions posed in the case were whether the amendments to Section 164(2) and Section 167(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013 are prospective, retrospective, or retroactive in nature, and whether there is any scope for giving opportunity to the defaulting company or its directors to represent against the disqualification under Section 164, read with Section 167 of the 2013 Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court found that the operation of the amendments to Sections 164 and 167 of the 2013 Act are prospective in nature, and allowed the writ petition, setting aside the deactivation of DIN by virtue of the notice dated April 7, 2017.
Final Decision: The Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the deactivation of DIN by virtue of the notice dated April 7, 2017.
JUDGMENT
Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J. - The Court:
1. The petitioner was a director of a Private Limited Company, namely, Lambodar Vinimay Private Limited, incorporated on January 27, 2009.
2. Vide public notice no. ROC/WB/STK/2017/1 dated April 7, 2017, it was declared that the name of the said company would stand removed/struck off from the Register of Companies within 30 days from the date of the notice, under Section 248(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as "the 2013 Act"). Accordingly, the petitioner's Director Identification Number (DIN) and Digital Signature Certificate (DSC) were deactivated under Section 164(2) of the 2013 Act, with effect from November 1, 2016 till October 3, 2021. The present writ petition has been preferred, challenging such disqualification of the petitioner by the impugned notice dated April 7, 2017.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner argues that sub-section (2) of Section 164 of the 2013 Act came into force from April 1, 2014 and can apply only prospectively. Thus, the three financial years, non-filing of the annual return and financial statement of the company for which would make the petitioner liable for deactivation of his DIN, would commence from April 1, 2014. The relevant three financial years would be 2014- 2015, 2015-2016 and 2016-2017, covering the period from April 1, 2014 to March 31, 2017. Hence, it is argued, the deactivation of the DIN with effect from November 1, 2016 was patently illegal.
4. The petitioner further argues that the last date for filing financial statements for the third financial year was October 30, 2017 (with regular fees) and July 27, 2018 (with additional fees) as per Section 403 of the 2013 Act, which provides for an additional period of 270 days. Thus, in any event, no question of disqualification of the petitioner arose before the expiry of the said period.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner next submits that the proviso to Section 167(1)(a) was inserted by the Amendment of Act of 2018 with effect from May 7, 2018. The said provision reads as follows:
"Section 167: Vacation of office of director - (1) The office of a director shall become vacant in case -
(a) he incurs any of the disqualifications specified in section 164:
Provided that where he incurs disqualification under sub-section (2) of section 164, the office of the director shall become vacant in all the companies, other than the company which is in default under that sub-section;
.... .... .... ...."
6. It is contended that such proviso would be applicable to companies whose names are struck off only after the introduction of the 2018 Amendment, that is, after May 7, 2018 and could not be invoked in the case of the petitioner.
7. The proviso, prior to the 2018 Amendment, read as follows:
"Provided that the office shall be vacated by the director even if he has filed an appeal against the order of such Court;" and did not contemplate the vacancy of the office of the director in respect of companies other than the defaulting company.
8. Learned counsel places reliance on Keshavan Madhava Menon vs. State of Bombay, (1951) AIR SC 128 , to submit that every statute is presumed to be prospective, unless the contrary is specifically stipulated. Thus, the operation of the amended Section 164(2) and the amended proviso to Section 167(1)(a) of the 2013 Act would not be operative prior to April, 2014 and May, 2018 respectively.
9. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that a conjoint reading of Sections 92, 96, 137 and 403 of the 2013 Act makes it clear that a copies of the annual returns of the company and of the financial statements thereof have to be filed within 60 days and 30 days respectively from the date on which the Annual General Meeting (AGM) is held. The AGM has to be held once in the financial year, within six months from the date of closing of the financial year, latest before exp
Allied Motors (P) Limited vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi
Dilip Kumar Sharma and others vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
K. Prabhakaran vs. P Jayarajan
Keshavan Madhava Menon vs. State of Bombay
Punjab National Bank and Others vs. Manjeet Singh & Another
Shah Bhojraj Kuverji Oil Mills and Ginning Factory vs. Subhash Chandra Yograj Sinha
State of Bombay (Now Maharashtra) vs. Vishnu Ramchandra
State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Narmada Bachao Andolan and another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.