SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Cal) 100

SUBHASIS DASGUPTA
Subhas Saha @ Bhakto Saha – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Abimanyu Banerjee, Advocate, Y.J. Dastoor, Advocate, Somnath Adhikary, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Subhasis Dasgupta, J. - The impugned order dated 18th January, 2018 passed by the Learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, 1st Court, Cooch Behar in NDPS Case No. 32 of 2017 under Sections 8 (c)/20(b)(ii)(c) of N.D.P.S Act, issuing warrant, proclamation and attachment simultaneously is the subject of challenge in this revisional application.

2. Learned advocate for the petitioner/revisionist taking resort to Sections 82 and 83 of the Code of Criminal Procedure submitted that there could not be any composite order issuing warrant of arrest and proclamation followed by attachment.

3. Argument was raised by the learned advocate for the petitioner that upon fulfilment of the circumstances, laid down in Sections 82 and 83 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the learned Magistrate could only issue proclamation and attachment in a case, where there had been a warrant of arrest issued previously against the absconding accused.

4. Mr. Dastoor, learned Additional Solicitor General representing the Union of India submitted that in this case, the warrant of arrest was issued against the petitioner on 23rd October, 2017, thereafter the same could not be executed against the petiti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top