SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Cal) 254

BISWAJIT BASU
Smt. Asha Singh – Appellant
Versus
Kamal Kumar Rathi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Asit Baran Raut, Mr. Tuhin Subhra Raut., for the Appellant; None., for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Biswajit Basu, J. - Whether an ex-parte decree passed on the failure of the defendant to file written statement within the time fixed under Order VIII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure can be set aside under Order IX Rule 13 of the Code, is the issue falls for consideration in the present revisional application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

2. The facts necessary to address the said issue is not in dispute which need to be recorded. The petitioners filed Ejectment Suit No. 19 of 2017 for eviction of the predecessor-in-interest of the opposite parties. The said predecessor-in-interest of the opposite parties entered appearance in the said suit at a belated stage and filed written statement with a prayer for acceptance of the same on condonation of delay. The order refusing to condone such delay was affirmed in revision in CO. 1189 of 2010.

3. On the death of the original defendant, the present defendants, the present opposite parties herein were substituted in the said suit. The prayer of the opposite parties to allow them to contest the suit by filing written statement was turned down by the learned Trial Judge. The said order was also affirmed in revi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top