SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Cal) 338

JOYMALYA BAGCHI, KRISHNA RAO
Mongal Mondal – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants :Mr. Ratan Das, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Ms. Amita Gaur, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Krishna Rao, J.

1. On the basis of the statement of one Sujit Roy, P.W.3, the police of P.S. Barasat registered F.I.R No. 1632/2011 dated 24.08.2011 under Section 498A/304B/34 IPC read with Section 3/4 of D.P. Act against Mongal Mondal who is the husband of the deceased and father-in-law (Ajit Mondal, Appellat No.2) and mother-in-law (Smti Sasthi Mondal) of the deceased Sharmistha Roy (Mondal). After registration of the case the police of P.S. Barasat had started an investigation and the appellants were arrested. In the written report it is stated that the youngest daughter of P.W.3 namely Sharmistha Roy (Mondal) aged about 19 years got married to Mongal Mondal of Hemanta Basu Nagar, 1. No. Mathpara P.O. Kadambagachi, P.S. Barasat on 5th Asardh, 1417 (according to Bangali era) as per Hindu rites and custom. At the time of marriage the bride groom was provided with gold ornaments and cash as per their claim. After marriage, his daughter Sharmistha Roy (Mondal) and Son-in-law Mangal went to live their domestic life at Hemanta Basu Nagar at his Son-in-law’s house but as the dowry was not as per his choice, his son-in-law Mangal, on the very next day of their marriage, told hi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top