ANANDA KUMAR MUKHERJEE
Tapan Kumar Ghosh – Appellant
Versus
Gopal Chandra Maity – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ananda Kumar Mukherjee, J.
1. Instant Criminal Revision has been filed by the petitioner being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgement and order passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-II, Contai, District-Purba Medinipur in Criminal Appeal No.3 of 2019, wherein the petitioner’s appeal was dismissed on contest and the impugned order dated 7.12.2018 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Court, Contai, Purba Medinipur in C.R case No.198 of 2015 was affirmed. In the impugned judgement. Learned Additional Sessions Judge, FTC-II, Contai directed the complainant/petitioner to surrender before the learned trial court within 10 days from date of the judgment.
2. In his application for criminal revision the petitioner urged that the judgement and order passed in the Criminal Appeal No.3 of 2019 is bad in law, illegal and the same is not sustainable in the eye of law. It is further contended that while passing the judgement the court ought to have scrutinized the source of Rs.3,50,000/-alleged to have been paid by the complainant/opposite party no.1 to the accused/petitioners as loan accommodation. It is also urged that l
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.