SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA
Satyen Sharat – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The petitioners are bus operators on various routes between Purnea and Kishengunge. The said routes pass both within the jurisdiction of the States of Bihar and West Bengal. The present challenge has been preferred against a draft Notification dated May 16, 2014 and a final Reciprocal Transport Agreement dated February 22, 2016, both published in the Kolkata Gazette by the Principal Secretary, Transport Department, Government of West Bengal.
2. The petitioners’ primary contention is that the said draft agreement, which ripened into the final Reciprocal Transport Agreement, are violative of the provisions of Section 88 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as, “the 1988 Act”). In respect of the locus standi of the petitioners to file the writ petition, the petitioners place reliance on a Special Bench judgment of this Court in Prabhat Pan and others Vs. The State of West Bengal and others, reported at AIR 2015 Cal 112, wherein it was held that the existing operator has a right to raise objection against the illegal, arbitrary grant of permit by the Transport Authority, more so, in respect of grants of permit which are affected by colourable exercise of
Prabhat Pan and others Vs. The State of West Bengal and others
Tilokchand and Motichand and others Vs. H.B. Munshi and another
Delhi Administration and others Vs. Madan Lal Nangia and others (2003) 10 SCC 321
Badrinath Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu and others (2000) 8 SCC 395
Chairman-Cum-Managing Director
State of Punjab Vs. Davinder Pal Singh Bhullar and others (2011) 14 SCC 770
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.