SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Cal) 66

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT CALCUTTA
Prakash Shrivastava, Rajarshi Bharadwaj, JJ.
Mousumi Roy - Appellant
Vs.
West Bengal State Election Commission - Respondent
WPA(P) 271 of 2021 and IA No: Can/2/2022
Decided On : 15-02-2022

Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Sabyasachi Chatterjee, Mr. Akashdeep Mukherjee, Mr. Pintu Karar, Mr. Sayan Banerjee, Advocates.
For the Respondent: Mr. S.N. Mookherjee, Ld. Ag, Mr. Samrat Sen, Ld. Aag, Mr. Anirban Ray, Ld. Gp, Mr. T.M. Siddiqui, Mr. Dabishis Ghosh, Adv.

The main legal point established in the judgment is that the State Election Commission has the responsibility to assess the ground situation and take a decision in respect of deployment of paramilitary forces if the circumstances so demand. Additionally, the court emphasized that the Election Commission is expected to consider the plea for simultaneous counting in all the Municipal Corporations or for the declaration of results of all the Municipal Corporations at the same time.

Headnote:

Elections - Municipal Corporations - West Bengal Municipal Elections Act, 1994, Sections 47, 48, 50, 57 - The court discussed the legality of the orders of the Election Commission dated 29th November, 2021 and 07th February, 2022, and the issue of simultaneous holding of counting and declaration of results of all the Municipal Corporations.

Fact of the Case:

The petitions raised issues about holding elections of municipal corporations and other local bodies in the State of West Bengal. The applicants were concerned about the potential for violence during the elections and questioned certain orders issued by the State Election Commission.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the State Election Commission to hold a joint meeting with the Chief Secretary and Home Secretary of the State and the Director General and Inspector General of Police to reassess the ground situation in Bidhannagar Municipal Corporation area and ascertain if deployment of paramilitary forces is necessary. The court also granted liberty to the applicants to file appropriate representation before the State Election Commission regarding their prayer for simultaneous counting of votes in all the Municipal Corporations or simultaneous declaration of results of polling in all the remaining Municipal Corporations or postponing the date of polling of remaining corporations.

Issues: The issues included the deployment of paramilitary forces, the legality of the orders of the Election Commission, and the simultaneous holding of counting and declaration of results of all the Municipal Corporations.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that it is for the State Election Commission to assess the ground situation and take a decision in respect of deployment of paramilitary forces if the circumstances so demand. The court also granted liberty to the applicants to file appropriate representation before the State Election Commission regarding their prayer for simultaneous counting of votes in all the Municipal Corporations or simultaneous declaration of results of polling in all the remaining Municipal Corporations or postponing the date of polling of remaining corporations.

Final Decision: The petitions were disposed of, and the court directed the State Election Commission to take appropriate decisions in accordance with the law within specified timeframes.

ORDER :

1. In both these writ petitions, the issue raised is about holding the elections of the municipal corporations/municipal council and other local bodies in the State of West Bengal.

2. CAN 2 of 2022 has been filed in WPA(P) 271 of 2021 challenging the order/notification of the State Election Commission dated 15.01.2022 and 07.02.2022 and seeking a direction to ensure free and fair elections and also to hold simultaneous counting of votes of all remaining Municipal Corporations/Municipalities.

3. CAN 4 of 2022 has been filed in WPA(P) No. 299 of 2021 by the writ petitioner questioning the order dated 25th January, 2022 issued by the State Election Commission and seeking modification of the notification dated 22nd December, 2021 whereby second phase of elections are scheduled to be held on 27th February, 2022. The decision of the respondent Nos. 3 and 4 in respect of the election agents has also been challenged in this CAN.

4. CAN 5 of 2022 and CAN 6 of 2022 have been filed with a prayer to direct the State Election Commission to take steps for deployment of Central Para-Military Forces during the Bidhannagar Corporation Election scheduled to be held on 12th February, 2022.

5. The Municipal General Elections to the Siliguri Municipal Corporation, Chandernagore Municipal Corporation, Bidhannagar Municipal Corporation and Asansol Municipal Corporation have been notified by the Election Commission on 15th January, 2022 by appointing 12th February, 2022 as the polling date.

6. The applicants in these CANs are expecting that free and fair elections may not take place on account of the apprehended violence during the election and they are also questioning certain orders issued by the State Election Commission.

7. Submission of the applicant in CAN 2 of 2022 is that the State Election Commission has issued illegal order dated 29.11.2021 providing that election agent must be an elector of the polling areas for which polling station is set up and order dated 07th February, 2021 making provision for polling agent in respect of polling premises where more than one polling station are situated. He submits that no such provision has been made under Sections 47, 48, 50 and 57 of the West Bengal Municipal Elections Act, 1994 or Rule 14 read with Form 11 of the West Bengal Municipalities (Conduct of Election) Rules, 1995 and that the order is also contrary to Clause 9.1 of the Handbook issued by the Election Commission of Indian about polling agents. He has also submitted that simultaneous counting of votes of all the Municipal Corporations should be done on a fixed date after completion of second phase of polling in other Municipal Corporations/Councils.

8. Learned Counsel for the applicant in CAN 4 of 2022 has also made a prayer for simultaneous counting of votes after completion of polling in the other Municipal Corporations/Councils in second phase on 27th February, 2022. An alternate prayer has been made that the date of polling in the second phase be postponed because first and second phase of polling on 14th February, 2022 and 27th February, 2022 are very close. Learned Counsel has also questioned the order issued by the State Election Commission in respect of polling agent.

9. In CAN 5 of 2022 and CAN 6 of 2022, learned Counsel for the applicants have submitted that considering the violence during the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Elections and also considering the earlier experience in the elections of Bidhannagar Minicipal Corporation, for free, fair and peaceful elections, it is necessary to deploy Central Paramilitary Forces in the forthcoming Bidhannagar Municipal Corporation Elections. They have submitted that the previous experience is that whenever CRPF is not deployed in Bidhannagar during elections, violence takes place. They have also referred to the earlier order of this Court dated 23rd December, 2021 whereby liberty was granted to file fresh IA with the prayer about deployment of paramilitary forces at the appropriate stage.

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      Judicial Analysis

      AI

      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top