SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Cal) 111

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT CALCUTTA
Debangsu Basak, Bibhas Ranjan De, JJ.
IN RE: AN APPLICATION FOR BAIL UNDER SECTION 439 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE — Appellant
Vs.
ANSAR ALI @ MD. ANSAR ALI — Respondent
CRM (DB) No. 87 of 2022
Decided On : 11-03-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. Kallol Kumar Basu, Mr. Jannat Ul Firdous.
For the Respondent: Mr. Rudradipta Nandy.

The court has the authority to ensure the presence of an advocate to address serious allegations and concerns about their conduct.

Headnote:

Court Procedure - Application for Consideration - Absence of Advocate - Police to Ensure Presence - Serious Allegations

Fact of the Case:

The advocate representing the case left the court premises during recess and did not return, prompting serious allegations and concerns about his conduct.

Finding of the Court:

The court found it appropriate to grant an opportunity for the advocate to appear and explain his conduct, and requested the police to ensure his presence in court on the next date.

Issues: Allegations of Advocate's Conduct

Ratio Decidendi: Ensuring the presence of the advocate in court to address serious allegations and concerns about his conduct.

Final Decision: The application was listed for consideration on the next date, with the police requested to ensure the advocate's presence in court.

ORDER :

1. The application is taken up for consideration subsequent to the order dated February 18, 2022.

2. The application was considered along with CRM (DB) No. 30 of 2022.

3. Prior to recess Mr. Arindam Roy, Advocate appeared and submitted that he wanted time. He was asked to come back at 2 P.M. today to continue with his submissions.

4. The Court is informed that Mr. Arindam Roy left the Court premises during recess.

5. He is not appearing now.

6. In view of the serious allegations levelled against him and in view of the affidavit filed on behalf of the State relating to the case, it would be appropriate to grant an opportunity to Mr. Arindam Roy, Advocate to appear and explains his conduct.

7. Given his conduct his presence should be ensured.

8. In such circumstances, the police are requested to ensure the presence of Mr. Arindam Roy, Advocate in Court on the next date.

9. List the application on March 16, 2022.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top