SUBHENDU SAMANTA
Hitesh Prahlad Bhatia @ Hitesh Prem Bhatia – Appellant
Versus
Deepak Raghani – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Subhendu Samanta, J.
1. These criminal revisions were preferred for quashing of a criminal proceedings being no C.S 21336/17, C.S. 34652/17, C.S. 34649/17 pending before the Learned jurisdictional Magistrate u/s 406/409/420/465/467/468/506 read with 120B/34 IPC.
2. The brief fact of the petition is that the petitioner no. 1 is the Limited Liability Partnership Farm and other petitioners are the office bearer/designated partner of said Farm. The opposite party and his brother are the real estate investor who had on earlier occasion invested and purchased office premises in other projects developed by the petitioners. Thereafter some times in 2014-2015 the opposite party came to know that the petitioner is coming with a new project and as such the opposite party and his brothers approached the petitioner for purchase few office space on the said new up-coming project. As there were previous acquaintance and transactions between them, the OP and his brother entered into an agreement to purchase some office space. The applications were signed between them and according to agreement and usual practice OP and his brother handed over requisite post dated cheques for the full b
Dalip Kaur & Ors Vs. Jagnar Sing & Ors.
M.N. Ojha & Ors. Vs. Alok Kumar Srivastav & Anr.
MEDMEME, LLC & Ors. Vs. IHORSE BPO SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED
Murari Lal Gupta Vs. Gopi Sing
Pratibha Rani Vs. Suraj Kumar & Anr
Prof. R.k. Vijayasarathy & Anr. Vs. Sudha Seetharam & Anr.
S.W. Palanitkar & Ors. Vs. State of Bihar & Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.