SUBRATA TALUKDAR, ANIRUDDHA ROY
Sunirmal Sarkar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Aniruddha Roy, J.
1. This mandamus appeal had arisen from the impugned judgment and order dated May 07, 2014 passed in WP No. 2131(W) of 2011 (Dr. Sunirmal Sarkar vs. Union of India & Ors.) whereunder the writ petition filed by the appellant was partially allowed only to the extent allowing the appellant to receive the provisional pension.
Facts:-
2. The appellant writ petitioner is a qualified Homeopathy Doctor. He was an employee of the National Institute of Homeopathy (for short, NIH) and had served his employer in various capacities and posts from time to time. The appellant opted for voluntary retirement on and with effect from March 20, 2008 from his employment and was governed under the provisions of the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 (for short, CCS Pension Rules).
3. Having opted for the said voluntary retirement from his service, the appellant did not receive his pension and retiral benefits. The appellant after about 2 years from his retirement received a letter dated January 07, 2010 Annexure P-3 to the writ petition from the fourth respondent informing the appellant that he had declared an amount of Rs. 1,65,492/- as income under the heading "income
Punjab State Power Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Atma Singh Grewal
Brajendra Singh Yambem vs. Union of India
State of Assam and Another vs. Raghava Rajgopalachari
Samsher Singh vs. The State of Punjab & Anr.
PU Myllai Hlychho & Ors. Vs. State of Mizoram & Ors.
Brajendra Singh Yambem vs. Union of India & Anr.
B.S. Yadav v. State of Haryana
Sampat Prakash v. State of J&K
State of M.P. v. Yashwant Trimbak
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.