IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Debangsu Basak, Md. Shabbar Rashidi, JJ.
Mohammed Majid - Appellant
Versus
The State of West Bengal – Respondent
CRA (DB) 100 of 2022 (CRAN 2 of 2022)
Decided On : 15-05-2023
Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 120B, 489A, 489B, 489C – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 293, 294 – Conspiracy – Fake currency - Appeal against conviction – Held, Case appellant was involved in counterfeiting of currency impugned judgment and order in respect of conviction appellants in connection with offences punishable seems to be without any basis and is liable to be set aside – No allegation against appellant corners written complaint prosecution case as submitted appellant ever tendered otherwise traffic fake Indian currency notes with an intention to use same as genuine – Application disposed.
Certainly. Based on the provided legal document, the key points are as follows:
The appellant, Mohammed Majid, was convicted under Sections 489A, 489B, and 489C of the Indian Penal Code for involvement in counterfeiting currency, with sentences of imprisonment and fines imposed (!) (!) .
The prosecution's case was based on the recovery of counterfeit currency notes from the appellant's possession, supported by eyewitness testimony, seizure lists, and forensic reports confirming the notes were fake (!) (!) .
The appellant was apprehended during a raid conducted after receiving source information about a fake currency dealer near AC Market, Khidirpur, and the seized currency was properly sealed, labelled, and identified in court (!) (!) .
The evidence included the seizure of counterfeit notes in various denominations, forensic examination reports confirming the notes were counterfeit, and the appellant’s arrest and custody details (!) (!) .
The defense challenged the applicability of some charges, the credibility of witnesses, and the legality of the proceedings, arguing that the prosecution failed to establish the appellant's involvement in counterfeiting or conspiracy beyond reasonable doubt (!) (!) .
The court found that the evidence sufficiently proved the possession of counterfeit currency by the appellant, and the forensic reports supported the conclusion that the notes were fake. The court upheld the conviction under Section 489C but set aside convictions under Sections 489A and 489B, as well as the conspiracy charge under Section 120B (!) (!) .
The court also noted that the appellant was not involved in manufacturing or trafficking the counterfeit notes and that there was no evidence of his active participation in counterfeiting beyond possession (!) (!) .
The period of detention already undergone by the appellant was to be deducted from the sentence, and the order was modified accordingly to affirm the conviction under Section 489C only (!) .
The judgment emphasized the importance of proper procedural adherence in the collection and presentation of forensic evidence, but confirmed the admissibility of the forensic report in this case (!) .
The appeal was allowed in part, with the convictions under certain sections being set aside and the sentence modified, and the case was disposed of accordingly (!) .
Please let me know if you need further analysis or specific legal advice regarding this case.
JUDGMENT :
Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.
1. The appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction dated November 11, 2021 and order of sentence dated November 14, 2021 passed by the learned Additional and Sessions Judge, Alipore, South 24Parganas in connection with Sessions Trial No. 5 of 2018 arising out of Sessions Case No. 44 (05) of 2018.
2. By the impugned judgment of conviction, the appellant was convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 489A/489B/489C of the Indian Penal Code. The accused Waseem Ahammed was, however, found not guilty of the charges. By the impugned order of sentence, the appellant was sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for eight years and a fine of Rs.50,000/-and in default of payment of the fine to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for six months for the offences punishable under Section 489A of the Indian Penal Code. He was further sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for eight years and a fine of Rs. 30,000/-and in default of the payment to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a further period of six months for the offences punishable under Section 489B of the Indian Penal Code. The appellant was also sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for five years and a fine of Rs. 20,000/-and in default of payment of the fine to suffer a further rigorous imprisonment for three months for the offences punishable under Section 489C of the Indian Penal Code. All the sentences were directed to run concurrently.
3. The facts giving rise to the instant case is that on December 04, 2017, one SI Biswajit Sarkar received a source information to the effect that one fake currency dealer from Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh was coming near AC Market, Khidirpur with a huge amount of fake currency notes for trafficking the same. The de facto complainant along with the raiding team proceeded to AC Market at Khidirpur. He also requested the local people to assist the raiding team in the search and seizure. At about 18.45 hrs., the source pointed out a person carrying a black coloured rucksack bag who was going from the side of Karl Marx Sarani. The raiding team on the footpath in front of the shop styled ‘Sufi Collections’ at 129C, Karl Marx Sarani, Kolkata-23 by the side of Sethi Diagnostic and Medicare Private Limited and Khidirpur AC market. The detained person disclosed his identity as the appellant. The de facto complainant offered himself to be searched by the detained person which he refused. Thereafter, search was conducted by the de facto complainant upon the detained person. Upon such search, the bag carried by the detainee was found to contain one black polythene carry bag which in turn contained a torn white coloured paper bags containing 283 pieces of Indian Currency Notes of the denomination of Rs. 500/-each and 295 pieces of Indian Currency Notes of the denomination of Rs. 100/-. The aforesaid currency notes appeared to be counterfeit. The polythene carry bag was kept in a sealed manner inside the bag along with the wearing apparels. A total of Rs.1,71,000/-Indian currency notes appearing to be counterfeit were seized from the possession of the detained person. The aforesaid currency notes along with the other article were seized by the de facto complainant under proper seizure list dated December 4, 2017. The seized articles were packed, sealed and labelled at the spot in presence of the detainee and the witnesses.
4. Accordingly, the detained person was arrested at 20.45 hrs. to enter into a criminal conspiracy with the other racketeers and for preparing or procuring counterfeit Indian currency notes to the tune of Rs.1,71,000/-and possessing the same knowing or having reason to believe the same to be forged for the purpose of trafficking. The de facto complainant lodged a written complaint in this regard with the officer in charge of Watganz PS.
5. On the basis of such written complaint, Watganj PS Case No. 344 dated December 04, 2017 under Section 120B/489A/489B/489C of the Indian Penal Code was start
State of Andhra Pradesh versus Gangula Satya Murthi
Prosecution must prove both knowledge and intent regarding the possession of forged currency; mere possession is insufficient for conviction under guiding statutes.
The prosecution had proved beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant was in possession of low quality counterfeit notes and that he had tried to use one of such low quality counterfeit notes to purc....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the significance of mens rea in offenses under Section 489B of the Indian Penal Code, emphasizing the requirement for the prosecution to prove t....
Possession of counterfeit currency alone does not warrant conviction under IPC Section 489A; trafficking established through possession leads to conviction under Sections 489B and 489C.
Possession of counterfeit currency requires proof of mens rea; mere possession is insufficient for conviction under relevant IPC sections.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the reliance on recoveries and expert testimony to establish guilt in counterfeiting cases, as well as the consideration of circumstances in senten....
The judgment clarifies that mere possession of counterfeit currency does not equate to being a mastermind, and the role of the accused must be considered in sentencing.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.