RAI CHATTOPADHYAY
Sunil Bharti Mittal – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Rai Chattopadhyay, J.
1. The two petitioners are the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of “Bharti Crescent”, respectively, against whom and other two persons the opposite party No.2 has lodged a complaint in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Bidhannagore, being registered as Complaint Case No. C/39 of 2015 (corresponding to T.R. No 44 of 2015), under sections 465 & 468 of the Indian Penal Code. The orders of the Court dated 17.1.2015 and 8.9.2015, passed in the said case, are under challenge in the instant revision.
2. In brief, the allegations of the complainant are as follows:-
On 30. 8. 2014 the complainant applied for two connections of Airtel broadband. As stated earlier, the present petitioners are the topmost authorities of the said company. The other two accused persons, to whom the complainant has said to have applied for the said connection, has been described in the complaint, as the agents of the present petitioners. The complainant has further stated that he was assured by the other two accused persons to be sent a ‘customer relationship form’, required to be filled in for the purpose of obtaining the said connections. Complainant has alleg
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.